Stained Glass Windows: An Essay: With a Report to the Vestry on Stained Glass Windows for Grace Church Lockport New YorkFaber, William Frederic
Religion
Stained Glass Windows: An Essay: With a Report to the Vestry on Stained Glass Windows for Grace Church Lockport New York
Faber, William Frederic
Glass painting and staining; Grace Episcopal Church (Lockport, N.Y.)
In the early period of the art, beginning in the eleventh century and
running parallel with the development of Pointed (commonly called
Gothic) Architecture, only true stained glass was used. The use of
enamel paints applied to the surface to produce a different color
marks also the beginning of the decadence of the art; for the glory of
true glass is in its jewel-like quality, its color being within itself
and all absolutely translucent, while a painted glass will always be
necessarily dull in comparison. The temptation to paint color upon the
surface of glass is readily understood: it was an easier method, it
promised wider scope, greater variety, in a word, the opportunity to
make pictures somewhat as the painter may upon canvas. But glass is
not canvas, and church windows are not to be pictures. Retribution has
overtaken this work, and the latest and most ambitious more speedily
than all; the enamel-painted glass has not stood the test of time,
becoming muddy and perishing while the true ancient stained glass is
still the joy and wonder of all who gaze upon it.
For, as we have said, the glory of true stained glass is in its rich,
jewel-like color. Its reds, which the makers called “ruby,” its blues
which they called “sapphire,” with its “emerald” greens, its “gold” and
its “pearl,” never entered the field to compete with the achievements
of the painter’s brush; to compare the delight they afford the beholder
with that derived from a painting would be in a sense as impossible as
a comparison between the fragrance of a flower and the cadence of a
song.
The early makers of stained glass windows contended with great, to
moderns they would be intolerable, limitations. They were almost
absolutely restricted to the primary colors. They had not at first the
art of blowing glass, but cast their pieces in small panes of at most
four or five inches in diameter. The use of the diamond in cutting
was not known till the sixteenth century. Hence their work was simply
mosaic. For variety they depended upon an arrangement of geometrical
patterns, or patterns of familiar architectural form and of common
ecclesiastical symbols. To construct these they leaded together their
pieces and bits of glass, elaborating their treatment as time went on,
but always in the main upon the same lines.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account