State Trials, Political and Social. Volume 2 (of 2)
History
State Trials, Political and Social. Volume 2 (of 2)
Trials -- Great Britain
_Atterbury_ was called, and swore that Sir Hugh Campbell was in his
custody; was captured 'making his escape out of a woodmonger's house,
both he and his son'; he owned that he had been in London four days, and
that he and his son and Bailey came to town together.
_West[20] was then called and sworn._
ATTORNEY-GENERAL--That which I call you to, is to know whether
or no, in your managery of this plot, you understand any of the
lords were concerned, and which.
MR. WEST--My lord, as to my lord Russell, I never had any
conversation with him at all, but that I have heard this, that
in the insurrection in November, Mr. Ferguson and colonel
Rumsey did tell me that my lord Russell intended to go down and
take his post in the West, when Mr. Trenchard had failed them.
LORD CHIEF-JUSTICE--What is this?
ATTORNEY-GENERAL--We have proved my lord privy to the consults;
now we go about to prove the under-actors did know it.
WEST--They always said my lord Russell was the man they most
depended upon, because he was a person looked upon as of great
sobriety.
LORD RUSSELL--Can I hinder people from making use of my name?
To have this brought to influence the gentlemen of the jury,
and inflame them against me, is hard.
LORD CHIEF-JUSTICE--As to this, the giving evidence by hearsay
will not be evidence; what colonel Rumsey, or Mr Ferguson told
Mr. West, is no evidence.
ATTORNEY-GENERAL--It is not evidence to convict a man, if there
were not plain evidence before; but it plainly confirms what
the other swears: but I think we need no more.
JEFFREYS--We have evidence without it, and will not use
anything of garniture; we will leave it as it is, we won't
trouble your lordship any further. I think, Mr. Attorney, we
have done with our evidence.
The Lord Chief-Justice then recapitulated the evidence given against
Lord Russell, dwelling particularly on the traitorous character of
Rumsey's message, Russell's privity to Trenchard's rising, the alleged
written declaration, and the consultations as to the best method of
effecting a rising, and finally called on Lord Russell to make his
defence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account