State Trials, Political and Social. Volume 2 (of 2)
History
State Trials, Political and Social. Volume 2 (of 2)
Trials -- Great Britain
such an act as overthrowing all inclosures (which is levying war), which
by construction only is against the King, but such cases are to be
distinguished from the levying of war against the King himself; see the
case of Dr. Story. As was seen in Plunket's[27] case, to invite a
foreign invasion is to conspire the death of the King. Coke, in the
passage before that relied on by Lord Russell, admits that this is the
law. When Coke says that to levy war is not an overt act for compassing
the death of the King (that is, is not evidence of such an intention),
Sir Henry Vane's case shows he is wrong.
As to the killing of the King, I am apt to think that was below
the honour of the prisoner at the bar ... but this is equal
treason; if they designed only to bring the King into their
power, till he had consented to such things as should be moved
in Parliament, it is equally treason as if they had agreed
directly to assassinate him.
Lord Howard, it is true, testified repeatedly to Lord Russell's
innocence, but was not this the best way of concealing his own guilt?
Surely Dr. Burnet would look on himself as the last person to whom
conspirators would confess their crimes.
_Jeffreys_ followed, recapitulating a few of the facts, but adding
nothing to the Solicitor-General's argument.
LORD CHIEF-JUSTICE--Gentlemen of the jury, the prisoner at the
bar stands indicted before you of High treason in compassing
and designing the death of the king, and declaring of it by
overt-acts endeavouring to raise insurrections, and popular
commotions, in the kingdom here. To this he hath pleaded, Not
Guilty. You have heard the evidence that hath been against him;
it hath been at large repeated by the king's counsel which will
take off a great deal of my trouble in repeating it again. I
know you cannot but take notice of it, and remember it, it
having been stated twice by two of the king's counsel to you;
'tis long, and you see what the parties here have proved. There
is first of all Col. Rumsey, he does attest a meeting at Mr.
Sheppard's house, and you hear to what purpose he says it was;
the message that he brought, and the return he had; it was to
enquire concerning a rising at Taunton; and that he had in
return to my lord Shaftesbury was, that Mr. Trenchard had
failed them, and my lord must be contented; for it could not be
that time. You hear that he does say, that they did design a
rising; he saith there was a rising designed in November, I
think he saith the seventeenth, upon the day of queen
Elizabeth's birth.[28] You hear he does say there was at that
meeting some discourse concerning inspecting the king's guards,
and seeing how they kept themselves, and whether they might be
surprised, and this he says was all in order to a rising. He
says, that at this my lord Russell was present. Mr. Sheppard
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account