Sticks and Stones: A Study of American Architecture and Civilization — John Shaqi
Sticks and Stones: A Study of American Architecture and CivilizationMumford, Lewis
History
Sticks and Stones: A Study of American Architecture and Civilization
Mumford, Lewis
Architecture -- United States
The merchant who has spent his hours in the counting house and on the
quay cannot with the most lofty effort convert himself into a classical
hero. It is different with men who have spent long nights and days
wrangling in the State House, men who have ridden on horseback through
a campaign, men who have plotted like Catiline and denounced like
Cicero, men whose daily actions are governed with the fine resolution
of a Roman general or dictator. Unconsciously, such men want a stage
to set off and magnify their actions. King Alfred can perhaps remain a
king, though he stays in a cottage and minds the cakes on the griddle;
but most of us need a little scenery and ritual to confirm these high
convictions. If the tailors had not produced the frock-coat, Daniel
Webster would have had to invent one. The merchant wants his little
comforts and conveniences; at most, he desires the architect to
make his gains conspicuous; but the hero who has drawn his sword or
addressed an assembly wants elbow room for gestures. His parlor must
be big enough for a public meeting, his dining room for a banquet.
So it follows that whereas under pre-Revolutionary conventions even
civic buildings like Independence Hall in Philadelphia are built on
a domestic scale, the early republican architecture is marked by the
practice of building its domestic dwellings on a public scale. The fine
houses of the early republic all have an official appearance; almost
any house might be the White House.
Even when Dickens made his first visit to America, the classical
myth and the classical hero had not altogether disappeared: one has a
painful memory of the “mother of the modern Gracchi,” and one sees how
the republican hero had been vulgarized into a Jacksonian caricature
like General Cyrus Choke. For a whole generation the classical myth
held men in its thrall; the notion of returning to a pagan polity,
quaintly modified by deism, was a weapon of the radical forces in
both America and France. Jean Jacques himself preached the virtues of
Sparta and Rome in Le Contrat Social, as well as the state of nature
which he praised in Emile; and, in general, “radicalism” associated
itself with the worship of rule and reason, as opposed to the caprice,
the irrationality, the brute traditionalism of what the children of
that age then characterized as “Gothic superstition.” Almost within
his lifetime Washington became Divus Cæsar, and if a monument was not
built to him immediately, a city was named after him, as Alexandria had
been named after Alexander. Did not the very war-veterans become the
Society of the Cincinnati; did not the first pioneers on the westward
march sprinkle names like Utica and Ithaca and Syracuse over the Mohawk
trail; and did not a few ex-soldiers go back to their Tory neighbor’s
plow? As Rome and Greece embodied the political interests of the age,
so did classical architecture provide the appropriate shell. Even those
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account