Stone's River: The Turning-Point of the Civil WarVance, Wilson J.
History
Stone's River: The Turning-Point of the Civil War
Vance, Wilson J.
Stones River, Battle of, Murfreesboro, Tenn., 1862-1863
"If contrary to our expectations, the British Government, either
alone or in combination with any other Government, should acknowledge
the insurgents, while you are remaining without further instructions
from this Government concerning that event, you will immediately
suspend the exercise of your functions.... I have now, in behalf of
the United States, and by the authority of their Chief Executive
Magistrate, performed an important duty. Its possible consequences
have been weighed and its solemnity is therefore felt and freely
acknowledged. This duty has brought us to meet and confront the
danger of a war with Great Britain and other States allied with the
insurgents who are in arms for the overthrow of the American Union.
You will perceive that we have approached the contemplation of that
crisis with the caution that great reluctance has inspired. But I
trust that you will also have perceived that the crisis has not
appalled us."
Mr. Adams must have perused this letter many times as he waited for the
meeting of the British Ministry,--which he learned had been called for
October 23,--to act upon the question of the Civil War in America. Indeed,
he had felt a strong impulse to call for his passports immediately after
the Gladstone speech at Newcastle, but had concluded to wait a few days
for formal action by the government to which he was accredited.
But now conditions and circumstances beyond the ken of diplomacy had
conspired to put the inevitable moment indefinitely forward. Whether, as
has been suggested, Gladstone, in his Newcastle speech, had intended to
force his colleagues into a position the only outlet of which was
recognition, or whether knowing their sentiments he had in mere exuberance
let the cat out of the bag, he had committed a grave breach of official
etiquette in thus speaking without express Cabinet sanction. It was a
false move, upon which Palmerston and Russell seized with eagerness
and,--it may be imagined,--private glee. Within a week Sir George
Cornewall Lewis, a member of the Cabinet, made, at Palmerston's express
direction, a public speech in which he adroitly gave the lie to Gladstone.
The fateful Cabinet meeting of the 23rd was postponed, and a new proposal
of Napoleon III that came at about this time,--a proposal looking to joint
mediation or intervention,--was rejected, on the ground that the time was
not yet ripe.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account