Studies in Classic American LiteratureLawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
History
Studies in Classic American Literature
Lawrence, D. H. (David Herbert)
American literature -- History and criticism
After all, it was not so terrible. The captain evidently did not exceed
the ordinary measure. Sam got no more than he asked for. It was a
natural event. All would have been well, save for the _moral_ verdict.
And this came from theoretic idealists like Dana and the seaman John,
rather than from the sailors themselves. The sailors understood
spontaneous _passional_ morality, not the artificial ethical. They
respected the violent readjustments of the naked force, in man as in
nature.
"The flogging was seldom, if ever, alluded to by us in the forecastle.
If anyone was inclined to talk about it, the other, with a delicacy
which I hardly expected to find among them, always stopped him, or
turned the subject."
Two men had been flogged: the second and the elder, John, for
interfering and asking the captain why he flogged Sam. It is while
flogging John that the captain shouts, "If you want to know what I flog
you for. I'll tell you----"
"But the behaviour of the two men who were flogged," Dana continues,
"toward one another, showed a delicacy and a sense of honour which would
have been worthy of admiration in the highest walks of life. Sam knew
that the other had suffered solely on his account, and in all his
complaints he said that if he alone had been flogged it would have been
nothing, but that he could never see that man without thinking that he
had been the means of bringing that disgrace upon him; and John never,
by word or deed, let anything escape him to remind the other that it was
by interfering to save his shipmate that he had suffered."
As a matter of fact, it was John who ought to have been ashamed for
bringing confusion and false feeling into a clear issue. Conventional
morality apart, John is the reprehensible party, not Sam or the captain.
The case was one of passional readjustment, nothing abnormal. And who
was the sententious Johannus, that he should interfere in this? And if
Mr. Dana had a weak stomach as well as weak eyes, let him have it. But
let this pair of idealists abstain from making all the other men feel
uncomfortable and fuzzy about a thing they would have left to its
natural course, if they had been allowed. No, your Johannuses and your
Danas have to be creating "public opinion," and mugging up the
life-issues with their sententiousness. O, idealism!
The vessel arrives at the Pacific coast, and the swell of the rollers
falls in our blood--the weary coast stretches wonderful, on the brink of
the unknown.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account