Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely considered — John Shaqi
Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely consideredHazlitt, William Carew
History
Studies in jocular literature : $b A popular subject more closely considered
Hazlitt, William Carew
Wit and humor -- History and criticism
But the complexion of the story, as a whole, is fictitious; and
while I do not for a moment believe that the verse is a contemporary
_impromptu_, I am strongly sceptical as to its claim to the character
even of a contemporary production. There is no ground for accrediting
the poet with the degree of poverty presumable from the description
of his clothes and his need of a trifling gratuity; and the very
texture of the lines is apocryphal. Besides, the narrator first makes
us understand that Randolph was unknown to Jonson and the rest of the
company, and then alleges their identification of him from a specimen
of poetry which could have furnished no clue whatever to the improviser.
I have dwelt on this point because the biographical scrap, so far from
standing alone or being a rare type, is a member of an exceedingly
numerous family, and the stricture has a common application to it and
its congeners.
The Retort and the Pun, and indeed the entire _genus_ of succincter
jests, are least prone to editorial treatment. But, on the other hand,
there are two classes which, from their nature, have a peculiar and an
inherent liability to sophistication--namely, the _Epigram_ and the
_Story_; and in fact the very structure of these ought to be, as a
general rule, a sufficient indication and evidence of their artificial
development. The droll and amusing tales in the old English jest-books
have been obviously woven into a narrative shape by the original
recipient of the particulars, or by some one else more experienced
in the science of literary _cuisine_. The inimitable account of John
Adroyns, who, after performing on some provincial stage the part of
his Satanic majesty, walked home in his theatrical garb, and met with
a complication of mishaps, is an excellent specimen of the professed
jocular compilation by a third person, as distinguished from a piece of
humour delivered to us exactly or approximately in the terms which the
actor or actors employed. So long as a pleasantry presents itself to
notice with honest credentials, there is no ground for complaint and no
source of difficulty; but it is where an anecdote is introduced under
fictitious colours, that the critical inquirer is apt to feel, if not
embarrassment, at least annoyance.
I shall transcribe one illustration of this kind of cross-bred
offspring from _Maloniana_:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account