Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 7: The Finished MysteryRussell, C. T. (Charles Taze)
Religion
Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 7: The Finished Mystery
Russell, C. T. (Charles Taze)
Bible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.; Jehovah's witnesses -- Controversial literature
“From the time the Nicene Creed was promulgated and accepted, A. D. 325,
there was practically no more Bible study for over twelve centuries.
During all that time Bible study was considered unnecessary, because the
Apostolic Bishops had formulated the creeds as proper statements of the
Church’s faith. To study the Bible would have meant the studying of how to
fight against the Emperor and the bishops.” (Z. ’15‐253.) “As a result of
the failure of these bishops to stand by the Word of the Lord, God’s
people for centuries have been confessing a Divine trinity, which is
incomprehensible; and meantime been neglecting the trinity taught by the
Bible, which is more reasonable. If the trinity of the creeds was
questioned, hands were lifted in horror, and the questioner was told that
the subject was a mystery, which he could not possibly understand, but to
doubt which would mean his damnation! The mysterious proposition was
sometimes stated to be 3 × 1 is 1; but others stated it differently, 1 × 3
is 1. No wonder if some of the more intelligent specimens of our race
declared themselves incapable of understanding such mathematics, and too
honest to confess and profess what they could not believe!” (B. S. M.) The
witness of Arius created a profound impression. “The doctrine was carried,
in the fifth century, into Africa, under the Vandals; and into Asia, under
the Goths. But it sunk almost at once, when the Vandals were driven out of
Africa, and the Goths out of Italy, by the arms of Justinian. However, it
revived again in Italy, under the protection of the Lombards, in the
seventh century, and was not extinguished till about the end of the
eighth. Arianism was revived in the West by Servetus, in 1531, for which
he suffered death.”—Buck.
Of the church in Pergamos.—From _Purgos_, a tower or citadel. “The name
was originally given to a remarkable hill, presenting a conical appearance
when viewed from the plain, and strongly fortified by nature and art.” (S.
B. D.) Concerning the literal city of Pergamos, of which the rising Papacy
was the antitype, we read, “The sumptuousness of the princes raised
Pergamos to the rank of the first city of Asia as regards splendor. It was
a sort of union of a pagan cathedral city, a university town, and a royal
residence, embellished during a succession of years by kings who all had a
passion for expenditure and ample means of gratifying it.”—McC.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account