Studies in the South and West, with Comments on CanadaWarner, Charles Dudley
History
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada
Warner, Charles Dudley
Canada -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
But we are writing of Americans, and the Americans are the quickest
people in the world to adapt themselves to new situations. The Western
people travel much, at home and abroad, and they do not require a very
long experience to know what is in bad taste. They are as quick as
anybody—I believe they gave us the phrase—to “catch on” to quietness and
a low tone. Indeed, I don’t know but they would boast that if it is a
question of subdued style, they can beat the world. The revolution
which has gone all over the country since the Exposition of 1876 in
house-furnishing and decoration is quite as apparent in the West as
in the East. The West has not suffered more than the East from
eccentricities of architecture in the past twenty years. Violations of
good taste are pretty well distributed, but of new houses the proportion
of handsome, solid, good structures is as large in the West as in the
East, and in the cities I think the West has the advantage in variety.
It must be frankly said that if the Easterner is surprised at the size,
cost, and palatial character of many of their residences, he is not less
surprised by the refinement and good taste of their interiors. There are
cases where money is too evident, where the splendor has been ordered,
but there are plenty of other cases where individual taste is apparent,
and love of harmony and beauty. What I am trying to say is that the East
undervalues the real refinement of living going along with the admitted
cost and luxury in the West. The art of dining is said to be a test of
civilization—on a certain plane. Well, dining, in good houses (I believe
that is the phrase), is much the same East and West as to appointments,
service, cuisine, and talk, with a trifle more freedom and sense of
newness in the West. No doubt there is a difference in tone, appreciable
but not easy to define. It relates less to the things than the way the
things are considered. Where a family has had “things” for two or three
generations they are less an object than an unregarded matter of course;
where things and a manner of living are newly acquired, they have more
importance in themselves. An old community, if it is really civilized (I
mean a state in which intellectual concerns are paramount), values less
and less, as an end, merely material refinement. The tendency all over
the United States is for wealth to run into vulgarity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account