Studies in the South and West, with Comments on CanadaWarner, Charles Dudley
History
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada
Warner, Charles Dudley
Canada -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
The agricultural life of Virginia appeals with scarcely less attraction
to the imagination of the novelist. Mr. Thackeray caught the flavor of
it in his “Virginians” from an actual study of it in the old houses,
when it was becoming a faded memory. The vast estates—principalities in
size—with troops of slaves attached to each plantation; the hospitality,
less costly, but as free as that of South Carolina; the land in the
hands of a few people; politics and society controlled by a small number
of historic families, intermarried until all Virginians of a certain
grade were related—all this forms a picture as feudal-like and foreign
to this age as can be imagined. The writer recently read the will of
a country gentleman of the last century in Virginia, which raises a
distinct image of the landed aristocracy of the time. It devised
his plantation of six thousand acres with its slaves attached, his
plantation of eighteen hundred acres and slaves, his plantation of
twelve hundred acres and slaves, with other farms and outlying property;
it mentioned all the cattle, sheep, and hogs, the riding-horses in
stables, the racing-steeds, the several coaches with the six horses that
drew them (an acknowledgment of the wretched state of the roads), and
so on in all the details of a vast domain. All the slaves are called
by name, all the farming implements were enumerated, and all the homely
articles of furniture down to the beds and kitchen utensils. This whole
structure of a unique civilization is practically swept away now, and
with it the peculiar social life it produced. Let us pause a moment
upon a few details of it, as it had its highest development in Eastern
Virginia.
The family was the fetich. In this high social caste the estates were
entailed to the limit of the law, for one generation, and this entail
was commonly religiously renewed by the heir. It was not expected that
a widow would remarry; as a rule she did not, and it was almost a matter
of course that the will of the husband should make the enjoyment of even
the entailed estate dependent upon the non-marriage of the widow. These
prohibitions upon her freedom of choice were not considered singular or
cruel in a society whose chief gospel was the preservation of the family
name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account