Studies in the South and West, with Comments on CanadaWarner, Charles Dudley
History
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada
Warner, Charles Dudley
Canada -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
The pride of this society preserved itself in a certain high, chivalrous
state. If any of its members were poor, as most of them became after the
war, they took a certain pride in their poverty. They were too proud to
enter into a vulgar struggle to be otherwise, and they were too old to
learn the habit of labor. No such thing was known in it as scandal.
If any breach of morals occurred, it was apt to be acknowledged with
a Spartan regard for truth, and defiantly published by the families
affected, who announced that they accepted the humiliation of it.
Scandal there should be none. In that caste the character of women was
not even to be the subject of talk in private gossip and innuendo. No
breach of social caste was possible. The overseer, for instance, and
the descendants of the overseer, however rich, or well educated, or
accomplished they might become, could never marry into the select
class. An alliance of this sort doomed the offender to an absolute and
permanent loss of social position. This was the rule. Beauty could no
more gain entrance there than wealth.
This plantation life, of which so much has been written, was repeated
with variations all over the South. In Louisiana and lower Mississippi
it was more prodigal than in Virginia. To a great extent its tone was
determined by a relaxing climate, and it must be confessed that it had
in it an element of the irresponsible—of the “after us the deluge.”
The whole system wanted thrift and, to an English or Northern
visitor, certain conditions of comfort. Yet everybody acknowledged its
fascination; for there was nowhere else such a display of open-hearted
hospitality. An invitation to visit meant an invitation to stay
indefinitely. The longer the visit lasted, if it ran into months,
the better were the entertainers pleased. It was an uncalculating
hospitality, and possibly it went along with littleness and meanness, in
some directions, that were no more creditable than the alleged meanness
of the New England farmer. At any rate, it was not a systematized
generosity. The hospitality had somewhat the character of a new country
and of a society not crowded. Company was welcome on the vast, isolated
plantations. Society also was really small, composed of a few families,
and intercourse by long visits and profuse entertainments was natural
and even necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account