Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada — John Shaqi
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on CanadaWarner, Charles Dudley
History
Studies in the South and West, with Comments on Canada
Warner, Charles Dudley
Canada -- Description and travel; United States -- Description and travel
Southern society has always had a certain prestige in the North. One
reason for this was the fact that the ruling class South had more
leisure for social life. Climate, also, had much to do in softening
manners, making the temperament ardent, and at the same time producing
that leisurely movement which is essential to a polished life. It is
probably true, also, that mere wealth was less a passport to social
distinction than at the North, or than it has become at the North; that
is to say, family, or a certain charm of breeding, or the talent
of being agreeable, or the gift of cleverness, or of beauty, were
necessary, and money was not. In this respect it seems to be true that
social life is changing at the South; that is to say, money is getting
to have the social power in New Orleans that it has in New York. It is
inevitable in a commercial and industrial community that money should
have a controlling power, as it is regrettable that the enjoyment of
its power very slowly admits a sense of its responsibility. The
old traditions of the South having been broken down, and nearly all
attention being turned to the necessity of making money, it must follow
that mere wealth will rise as a social factor. Herein lies one danger to
what was best in the old régime. Another danger is that it must be put
to the test of the ideas, the agitations, the elements of doubt and
disintegration that seem inseparable to “progress,” which give Northern
society its present complexity, and just cause of alarm to all who watch
its headlong career. Fulness of life is accepted as desirable, but it
has its dangers.
Within the past five years social intercourse between North and South
has been greatly increased. Northerners who felt strongly about the
Union and about slavery, and took up the cause of the freedman, and were
accustomed all their lives to absolute free speech, were not comfortable
in the post-reconstruction atmosphere. Perhaps they expected too much of
human nature—a too sudden subsidence of suspicion and resentment. They
felt that they were not welcome socially, however much their capital and
business energy were desired. On the other hand, most Southerners were
too poor to travel in the North, as they did formerly. But all these
points have been turned. Social intercourse and travel are renewed. If
difficulties and alienations remain they are sporadic, and melting away.
The harshness of the Northern winter climate has turned a stream of
travel and occupation to the Gulf States, and particularly to Florida,
which is indeed now scarcely a Southern State except in climate. The
Atlanta and New Orleans Exhibitions did much to bring people of all
sections together socially. With returning financial prosperity all the
Northern summer resorts have seen increasing numbers of Southern people
seeking health and pleasure. I believe that during the past summer more
Southerners have been travelling and visiting in the North than ever
before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account