Another early example of an emotional expression passing into a germinal
sign is that called forth at the sight of moving creatures. This acts as
a strong stimulus to the baby brain, and vigorous muscular reactions,
vocal and other, are wont to appear. One little boy of twelve and
three-quarter months usually expressed his excitement by the sound
“Dō-boo-boo,” which was used regularly for about ten days on the
appearance of a dog, a horse, a bird, and so forth. Here we have a
protoplasmic condition of the lingual organism which we call a name, a
condition destined never to pass into another and higher. Sometimes,
however, these explosives at the sight of animal life grow into
comparatively fixed signs of recognition.
In this spontaneous invention of quasi-linguistic sounds imitation plays
a considerable part. It is evident, indeed, that gestures are largely
imitative. Thus the sniff and the mimic kiss referred to just now are
plainly imitations of movements. The pointing gesture, too, may be said
to be a kind of imitation of the reaching and appropriating movement of
the arm. The sound ‘dō-boo-boo’ used on seeing an animal was probably
imitative. According to Preyer the sounds called forth by the sight of
moving objects, _e.g._, rolling balls and wheels, are imitative.[68]
Whether the signs of hunger, ‘mum,’ ‘numby,’ are due to modifications of
the movements carried out in sucking, seems to be more problematic.[69]
-----
Footnote 68:
_Op. cit._, p. 358.
Footnote 69:
A fact that appears to tell against imitation here is that one little
boy of seventeen months used the sound ‘did’n’ for anything to eat.
-----
In certain cases imitation is the one sufficient source of the sound. In
what are called onomatopoetic sounds the child seeks to mimic some
natural sound, and such imitation is capable of becoming a fruitful
source of original linguistic invention. A boy between nine and ten
months imitated the sound of young roosters by drawing in his breath,
and this noise became for a time a kind of name for any feathered
creature, including small birds. More commonly such onomatopoetic sounds
come to be distinctive recognition-signs of particular classes of
animals, such as ‘oua-oua’ or ‘bow-wow’ for the dog, ‘moo-moo’ for the
cow, ‘ouack-ouack’ or ‘kuack’ for the duck, and so forth.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account