As with words, so with whole expressions and sayings. It was a natural
movement of childish thought when a little school-girl answered the
question of the Inspector, ‘What is an average?’ by saying ‘What the hen
lays eggs on’. She had heard her mother say, “The hen lays so many eggs
‘on the average’ every week,” and had no doubt imagined a little myth
about this ‘average’. Again, most of us know what queer renderings the
child-mind has given to Scripture language. Mr. James Payn tells us that
he knew a boy who for years substituted for the words, ‘Hallowed be thy
name,’ ‘Harold be thy name’.[118] In this and similar cases it is not,
as might be supposed, defective hearing—children hear words as a rule
with great exactness—it is the impulse to give a familiar and
significant rendering to what is strange and meaningless.[119] A friend
of mine when a boy was accustomed on hearing the passage, ‘If I say
peradventure the darkness shall cover me,’ etc., to insert a pause after
‘peradventure,’ apprehending the passage in this wise: "If I say
‘Peradventure!’—the darkness," etc. In this way he turned the mysterious
‘peradventure’ into a mystic ‘open sesame,’ and added a thrilling touch
of magic to the passage. My friend’s daughter tells me that on hearing
the passage, “I ... visit the sins of the fathers upon the children unto
the third and fourth generation, ... and show mercy unto thousands,” she
construed the strange word ‘generation’ to mean an immense number like
‘billion,’ and was thus led to trouble herself about God’s seeming to be
more cruel than kind.[120]
-----
Footnote 118:
In the _Illustrated London News_, 30th June, 1894.
Footnote 119:
Of course defective auditory apprehension may assist in these cases.
Goltz gives an example from his own childhood. He took the words
“Namen nennen Dich nicht” to be “Namen nenne Dich nicht,” and was
sorely puzzled at the idea of bidding a name not to name itself.
Footnote 120:
Psalm cxxxix. and Second Commandment, Prayer-book version.
-----
In some cases, too, where the language is simple enough a child’s brain
will find our meaning unsuitable and follow a line of interpretation of
its own. Mr. Canton relates that his little heroine, who knew the lines
in _Strumpelpeter_—
The doctor came and shook his head,
And gave him nasty physic too—
was told that she would catch a cold, and that she at once replied, “And
will the doctor come and shook my head?”[121] It was so much more
natural to suppose that when the doctor came and did something this was
carried out on the person of the patient.
-----
Footnote 121:
_The Invisible Playmate_, p. 35.
-----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account