Later shrinkings from animals show more of the nature of fear. It is
sometimes said that children inherit from their ancestors the fear of
certain animals. Thus Darwin, observing that his boy when taken to the
Zoological Gardens at the age of two years and three months showed fear
of the big caged animals whose form was unfamiliar to him (lions,
tigers, etc.), infers that this fear is transmitted from savage
ancestors whose conditions of life compelled them to shun these deadly
creatures. But as M. Compayré has well shown[144] we do not need this
hypothesis here. The unfamiliarity of the form of the animal, its
bigness, together with the awful suggestions of the cage, would be quite
enough to beget a vague sense of danger.
-----
Footnote 144:
_Evolution intellectuelle et morale de l’Enfant_, p. 102.
-----
So far as I can ascertain facts are strongly opposed to the theory of an
inherited fear of animals. Just as in the first months a child will
manifest something like recoil from a pretty and perfectly innocent
pigeon, so later on children manifest fear in the most unlikely
directions. In _The Invisible Playmate_, we are told of a girl who got
her first fright on seeing a sparrow drop on the grass near her, though
she was not the least afraid of big things, and on first hearing the dog
bark in his kennel said with a little laugh of surprise, ‘Oh!
coughing’.[145] A parallel case is sent me by a lady friend. One day
when her daughter was about four years old she found her standing, the
eyes wide open and filled with tears, the arms outstretched for help,
evidently transfixed with terror, while a small wood-louse made its slow
way towards her. The next day the child was taken for the first time to
the “Zoo,” and the mother anticipating trouble held the child’s hand.
But there was no need. A ‘fearless spirit’ in general, she released her
hand at the first sight of the elephant, and galloped after the monster.
If inheritance played a principal part in the child’s fear of animals
one would have expected the facts to be reversed: the elephant should
have excited dread, not the harmless insect.
-----
Footnote 145:
See pp. 26, 27.
-----
So far as my own observations have gone there seems to be but little
uniformity among children’s fears of the animal world. What frightens
one child may delight another at about the same age. Perhaps there is a
tendency to a special dread of certain animals, more particularly the
wolf, which as folk-lore tells us reflects the attitude of superstitious
adults. Yet it is probable that, as the case of the boy C. suggests, the
dread of the wolf grows out of that of the dog, the most alarming of the
domestic animals, while it is vigorously sustained by fairy-story.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account