The treatment of the foot shows a process of evolution similar to that
seen in the treatment of the hand. At first a bald abstract indication
or suggestion is noticeable, as where a short line is drawn across the
extremity of the leg. In place of this a contour-form, more especially a
circle or knob, may be used as a designation. Very interesting here is
the differentiation of treatment according as the booted or naked foot
is represented. Children brought up in a civilised community like
England, though they sometimes give the naked foot (see p. 342, Fig. 7
(_d_), where the claw pattern is adopted), are naturally more disposed
to envisage the foot under its boot-form. Among the drawings of the
Jamaica children, presumably more familiar with the form of the naked
foot, I find both the toasting-fork and the burr arrangement, as also a
rude claw, or birch-like device used for the foot (see above, pp. 336,
338, 345, Figs. 2, 4 (_b_), and 12). The toasting-fork arrangement
appears in General Pitt-Rivers’ collection of savage drawings. Also a
bird’s foot treatment often accompanies a similar treatment of the hand
in the pictographs of savage tribes, and in the drawings of Von den
Steinen’s Brazilians (see above, pp. 338, 339, Fig. 4 (_a_) and (_c_)).
[Illustration: Fig. 26 (_b_).]
[Illustration: Fig. 26 (_c_).]
An attempt to represent the booted foot seems to be recognisable in the
early use of a triangular form, as in the accompanying drawing by a
small artist of five (Fig. 26 (_a_)).[258] Very curious is the way in
which the child seeks to indicate the capital feature of the boot, the
division of toe and heel. This is very frequently done by continuing the
line of the leg so as to make a single or a double loop-pattern, as in
the following (Fig. 26 (_b_), (_c_); _cf._ above, p. 342, Fig. 7 (_b_)).
A tendency to a more restrained and naturalistic treatment is sometimes
seen (see above, p. 354, Fig. 24 (_a_) and (_b_)). It may be added that
the notch between toe and heel is almost always exaggerated. This may be
seen by a glance at Figs. 17 and 22 (_a_), pp. 348, 352. The same thing
is noticeable in a drawing by a young Zulu in General Pitt-Rivers’
collection.
-----
Footnote 258:
This is hardly conclusive, as I find the triangular form used for the
foot of a quadruped, presumably a horse.
-----
_Front and Side View of Human Figure._
So far, I have dealt only with the treatment of the front view of the
human face and figure. New and highly curious characteristics come into
view when the child attempts to give the profile aspect. This comes
considerably later than the early lunar representation of the full face.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account