In as much as our observations are confined to a particular group of cases and the study of these was undertaken during the five weeks of the acute epidemic, these results are not to be compared with the collected statistics on influenza as they shall be made over a period beginning with the onset of the epidemic and ending with the last vestiges remaining after months or it may be years of time. Our observations are to be considered only in the light of the events taking place during the height of an epidemic wave. In as much as influenza presents itself during an epidemic in different forms, we shall again mainly limit the report upon our investigations of those cases having respiratory lesions. Our acute observations were made upon the tissues of those who had died of this disease. It is impossible, or nearly so, to fully study the tissues of those with lesser lesions and who recover. Hence, if we divide the influenza cases into those (1) without pulmonary lesions and (2) those with pulmonary lesions, we must state that all of our cases coming to autopsy fall in the second group. It is true that one of these having pulmonary lesions was not brought to his fatal termination by them but by a septicæmia arising in the middle ear. He had distinct lesions in his lungs. In other words, our autopsy material represents epidemic influenza in which the lung was definitely involved in an inflammatory state. In all but one of these the pulmonary lesion was the cause of death. No doubt, if opportunity had presented itself to follow a large epidemic through months of its progress, during which late complications in various portions of the body would make their appearance, our analysis would give a different picture and the pulmonary factor for the fatal termination would not be in such prominence. Of the first group, those cases of epidemic influenza not showing pulmonary lesions, we will have very little to say, in as much as the pathological investigations of them is impossible, or nearly so, during the height of the disease. Such cases apparently do not die at this period. I am willing to admit that individuals without pulmonary involvement may succumb, but I question whether their death has been due to the result of the influenzal lesions, be it in nose, pharynx, larynx or trachea, or be it in the intestine, but rather that the fatal termination occurred later in the course of this complex disease, when distant vital organs became involved or incapacitated in a toxemia or secondary bacterial invasion. We must clearly distinguish these cases from the clear-cut ones of epidemic influenza, looking upon the new circumstances as complications aside from the original disease. Such, for example, is the case we have mentioned where a fatal streptococcus bacteriæmia followed in the wake of an otitis media. In our experience we have not had a fatal case of the acute epidemic disease in which the lung was not involved.