In types of epidemic disease such as we have just had, where the epidemic wave has passed over in a period of four or five weeks, there is always much to be regretted which has been left undone. We tried as far as possible to gain all the information available at the time of collecting our materials and of laying aside such of the work which could be accomplished at a subsequent date. The materials were collected from divergent sources in the cadaver, and the more perishable substances were analyzed immediately. During the period of the epidemic 32 autopsies were performed and as much use as possible was made of each for a thorough comprehension of the lesions. _Materials_ During the period of our work 639 patients were admitted to the hospital suffering from clinical influenza. The cases varied in type from the very mild to the extremely ill. The majority of the cases were of the type of “three-day fever.” Clinically 81 cases developed pneumonia, and of these, 35 died. It would, of course, be impossible to say how many other individuals had a pulmonary involvement which could not be recognized clinically. In fact, some of the cases which did come to autopsy were only recognized as having a pulmonary involvement when the lungs were examined outside of the body. The physicians freely admitted that the physical signs were quite unusual and unlike those of the ordinary forms of pneumonia. In fact, except for the fact that we were living in the midst of an epidemic of respiratory infections, there was nothing to make the clinician suspect that many of these cases had a pulmonary involvement. Obviously, when the recognized signs of different types of pneumonia made their appearance, the clinician did not fail to make proper interpretation of the lung involvement. This, as we shall discuss later, is an event superadded to a lung condition which pathologically must be recognized as pneumonia (inflammation) and which differs so decidedly from what we know of as croupous or lobar pneumonia, as well as ordinary broncho-pneumonia that it would be incorrect to include them under this heading, although the distribution of the lesion may have lobar, bronchial or lobular characters. TABLE I