Studies on Fermentation: The diseases of beer, their causes, and the means of preventing themPasteur, Louis
Science
Studies on Fermentation: The diseases of beer, their causes, and the means of preventing them
Pasteur, Louis
Beer; Fermentation
We then replaced the porcelain dish in which the curved escape tube of A
had been plunged, by a vessel filled with mercury.
[Illustration: Fig. 61.]
The following is a description of two of these comparative fermentations
and the results they gave.
The fermentable liquid was composed of yeast-water sweetened with 5 per
cent. of sugar-candy; the ferment employed was _saccharomyces
pastorianus_.
The impregnation took place on January 20th. The flasks were placed in
an oven at 25° C. (77° F.).
_Flask A, without air._
January 21st.—Fermentation commenced; a little frothy liquid issued
from the escape-tube and covered the mercury.
The following days, fermentation was active. Examining the yeast
mixed with the froth that was expelled into the mercury by the
evolution of carbonic acid gas, we found that it was very fine,
young, and actively budding.
February 3rd.—Fermentation still continued, showing itself by a
number of little bubbles rising from the bottom of the liquid, which
had settled bright. The yeast was at the bottom in the form of a
deposit.
February 7th.—Fermentation still continued, but very languidly.
February 9th.—A very languid fermentation still went on, discernible
in little bubbles rising from the bottom of the flask.
_Flask B, with air._
January 21st.—A sensible development of yeast.
The following days, fermentation was active, and there was an
abundant froth on the surface of the liquid.
February 1st.—All symptoms of fermentation had ceased.
As the fermentation in A would have continued for a long time, being so
very languid, and as that in B had been finished for several days, we
brought to a close our two experiments on February 9th. To do this we
poured off the liquids in A and B, collecting the yeasts on tared
filters. Filtration was an easy matter, more especially in the case of
A. Examining the yeasts under the microscope, immediately after
decantation, we found that both of them remained very pure. The yeast in
A was in little clusters, the globules of which were collected together,
and appeared by their well defined borders to be ready for an easy
revival in contact with air.
As might have been expected, the liquid in the flask B did not contain
the least trace of sugar; that in the flask A still contained some, as
was evident from the non-completion of fermentation, but not more than
4·6 grammes (71 grains). Now, as each flask originally contained 3
litres of liquid, holding in solution 5 per cent. of sugar, it follows
that 150 grammes (2,310 grains) of sugar had fermented in the flask B,
and 145·4 grammes (2,239·2 grains) in the flask A. The weights of yeast
after drying at 100° C. (212° F.) were—
For the flask B, with air 1·970 grammes (30·4 grains).
For the flask A, without air 1·368 grammes.[113]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account