Studies on Fermentation: The diseases of beer, their causes, and the means of preventing themPasteur, Louis
Science
Studies on Fermentation: The diseases of beer, their causes, and the means of preventing them
Pasteur, Louis
Beer; Fermentation
§ V.—New Comparative Studies on the Germs held in Suspension by the Air
of Different Places which are near each other, but Subjected to
Different Conditions affecting the Production and Diffusion of the
Particles of Dust found in them.
We may compare the character and the greater or less abundance of
similar germs existing in neighbouring localities, by studying the
changes which take place in similar liquids exposed simultaneously to
the action of the air in those localities. To do this, we must prepare a
large number of flasks of the same size, free from air, and containing
about equal quantities of a particular liquid—the same being used for
all. We must open the same number of these flasks in each of the
localities we have selected, and permit the air with all its particles
of dust to rush into them; then we must close our flasks again, and
observe, day by day, the appearances they present. The results obtained
by these means will not furnish us with conclusions applicable to every
kind of germ that the air contains at any given moment, but only with
conclusions which apply to those germs which can develop in the
particular liquid employed. Thus, for example, we could draw no
inference as to the nature and relative number of _bacteria_ or
_vibrios_, in the case where we employ an acid liquid; for organisms of
that kind we must have recourse to neutral or slightly alkaline
infusions. On the other hand, liquids having a feeble acid reaction
would favour the growth of _mucedines_, _mycoderms_, and certain
ferments, as for example, the alcoholic.
On November 26th, 1872, we opened and reclosed thirty flasks containing
must kept from the last vintage.
Ten flasks were opened at the bottom of the garden of the _École
Normale_.
Ten on the landing of the second floor.
Ten in the principal room of our laboratory, which had been swept out
shortly before, by which operation the dust of the floor had been raised
and put in motion.
Different objects made their appearance in a certain number of the
thirty flasks on the following days; but from December 17th, things
remained stationary. The following observations were made at that date:—
Of the ten flasks from the bottom of the garden, only one had undergone
any change.
Of the ten flasks from the interior of the building, four had undergone
change.
Of the ten flasks from our laboratory, all had undergone change.
The difference in the number of germs held in suspension in the three
different places whence we had taken our air was, therefore,
considerable.
The difference in the nature of the germs was equally marked. Those
flasks of our first two series which had undergone change presented no
trace of _torulæ_, or anything besides fungoid growths, whilst three of
the last ten contained _torulæ_ associated with fungoid growths.[44]
[Illustration: Plate 3. Torulæ in Process of Development.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account