Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
“I will not say much about submarine vessels, but I will say that I am
glad that the Admiralty, under the advice of Lord Goschen, took the view
that it was wise not to be found unprepared in regard to this matter. We
have a great amount of information about these boats, but we do not
attach an exaggerated value to it. But we believe that an ounce of
practice is worth a ton of theory, and that when we get officers and men
to see these boats, they will learn more from them than from many
reports which come from foreign countries. One thing stands between the
submarine boat and efficiency, and that is the motor by which it is
propelled. But there is no disguising the fact that if you can add speed
to the other qualities of the submarine boat, it might in certain
circumstances become a very formidable vessel. We are comforted by the
judgment of the United States and Germany, which is hostile to these
inventions, which I confess I desire shall never prosper.—(Commander
Young, M.P., said that if the Admiralty built any submarine boats, all
he would ask would be that he might not be ordered to serve on one.)—But
we cannot regard our position as the same as that of other nations. The
United States to-morrow, if a perfect submarine were invented, would not
only have more secure protection for their harbours. In Germany the
harbours are no doubt carefully protected now. But we live in the narrow
waters of the Channel, and our problem is not precisely that of any
other nation, and I am glad that Lord Goschen did give this instruction
to the Board which has now borne fruit in the determination to put this
experiment into execution, and we shall see the result of it during the
next financial year.”
Mr. Edmund Robertson, K.C., in the debate on the Navy Estimates on March
21, 1901, remarked that as the building of the submarine boats was only
a matter of experiment, he thought it might have been introduced upon a
somewhat smaller scale. If its value was purely conjectural, he should
have said that one boat would have been enough to experiment with. Two
should have been quite enough, but we generally did things on a large
scale, and after having refused to say one word for many years about
submarine boats, we now found the Admiralty launching out into quite a
little fleet of them. “What,” asked Mr. Robertson, “had become of the
control of the House of Commons? What had become of that control when
the Admiralty of the day, having refused to tell them their policy, come
forward shortly afterwards and say they will build five of these boats?”
He could not help protesting against this, for a new departure of this
nature ought not to have been made except with the sanction of the
House, and at the very least it ought not to have been done without
being divulged to the House.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account