Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
_It may be said that the encouragement given to the inventor by the
Admiralty is so scanty as to make him shy of offering them his ideas.
Let us hope, now that Lord Selborne and Mr. Arnold Forster are at the
Admiralty, that the bad old days when inventors were snubbed, and novel
ideas ridiculed, have gone never to return. The submersible craft of
to-day is no longer an ingenious toy; it is a practiced engine of
warfare of no mean value. But there is vast room for improvement in its
design. It must be endowed with more speed, its longitudinal stability
must be improved, and its appliances for under-water vision perfected.
Are there not Britons willing to devote their energies to the
realisation of the ideal submarine?_
_The author has derived his information from a great many sources, some
of which are mentioned in the brief Bibliography at the end of the
book._
_He desires to express his thanks to Messrs. Vickers Sons & Maxim, the
Holland Torpedo-boat Company, Mr. P. W. D’Alton, Lieutenant A. T.
Dawson, late R.N., Mr. Simon Lake and others, for information kindly
given him respecting various boats and for photographs. To Mr. Alan H.
Burgoyne his thanks are due for permission to use some of his original
sketches._
ROYAL SOCIETIES’ CLUB,
ST. JAMES STREET, S.W.
INTRODUCTION
BY
ADMIRAL THE HON. SIR E. R. FREMANTLE, G.C.B, C.M.G.
(_Rear-Admiral of the United Kingdom._)
The natural attitude of the Naval mind towards submarines is the same
now as that expressed by Lord St. Vincent when Fulton invented the
notorious “catamaran” expedition.
Fulton had been trying some experiments before Pitt, who favoured the
project, to which Lord St. Vincent, then First Lord of the Admiralty,
was strongly opposed, and he bluntly stated that “Pitt was the greatest
fool that ever existed to encourage a mode of war which those who
commanded the seas did not want, and which, if successful, would deprive
them of it.”
It was, our Admiralty recently held, “the weapon of the weaker power,
and not our concern,” then we were to “watch and wait,” which sounded
plausible but was evidently dangerous, and as the success of the French
submarines became too evident we were forced to follow suit. As Lord
Selborne reminded us when speaking about the boilers, we have too often
ignored new inventions and resisted change till we were left well behind
in the race, as we were with ironclads, breech-loading guns, and other
improvements in naval warfare.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account