Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future — John Shaqi
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
Science, although she is continually placing man in possession of
weapons more terrible and more destructive than those of the previous
generation, really acts for the good of humanity at large, who owe a
debt of gratitude to the mechanical geniuses who have evolved modes of
warfare which enable war to be waged with as little unpleasantness as
possible to the peaceful populations that have no concern with it.
In one respect at least modern warfare is certainly more humane than
that of olden times, and this is in the treatment of the wounded and the
captured. In ancient warfare the fate of the captive was death or
slavery, and in early battles no quarter was given, except to personages
of great distinction, and the object of both sides was to slay as many
of their opponents as possible, and as surrender only made the prisoner
the perquisite of his captor, the fighting was both bloody and fierce.
Even as late as 1780 a prisoner was still viewed as the property of the
victor, and there was a regular scale or tariff of payments.
One instance culled from an account of a battle between Christians and
Turks, written by Geoffrey de Vinesauf, must suffice.
“Drawing the hostile galley with them to the shore the victors exposed
it to be destroyed by our people of both sexes who met it on land. Then
our women seized and dragged the Turks by the hair, beheading them and
treating them with every indignity and savagely stabbing them, and the
weaker their hands so much the more protracted were the pains of death
to the vanquished, for they cut off their heads not with swords but with
knives.”
Dr. Macdonell has pointed out that the only notable survival of
barbarism in respect to captives was the rule—abrogated apparently in
some countries but retained by us for reasons never satisfactorily
explained—that the crews of pirate vessels captured at sea were treated
as prisoners of war.
In the next great fight on the seas, if a submarine boat should be hit
by the quick-firing guns of a battleship she is endeavouring to destroy,
her crew, provided they are not sunk like rats in a trap, will be picked
up by the ironclad’s boats and kept as prisoners of war till hostilities
are at an end.
We are reminded of some lines in Mr. Kipling’s poem, “Kitchener’s
School”—
“They terribly carpet the earth with dead, and before their cannon cool
They walk unarmed by twos and threes and call the living to school.”
Those who argue in favour of the suppression of under-water warfare have
pointed out that whereas the battleship can save the crew of the torpedo
vessel, the latter owing to her small size can only steam away, sending
the big ship to the bottom, and leave the unfortunate crew to drown or
save themselves as best they can, which, with shell and shot flying
about, would not be easy. A way out of the difficulty has not been found
yet.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account