Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future — John Shaqi
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and FutureFyfe, Herbert C.
History
Submarine Warfare, Past, Present, and Future
Fyfe, Herbert C.
Submarine warfare
In the second, the weight of the boat remains constant, but the
displacement is altered by the drawing in of “cylinders” or “drums;”
thus she sinks until her displacement again equals her weight.
The first inventor to employ the latter method was André Constantin, who
built a vessel during the siege of Paris, which was furnished with
pistons working in two cylinders; on these being drawn in from the
interior the boat sank to the required depth. The actual trials were,
however, not satisfactory. The _Nautilus_, of Messrs. Campbell & Ash,
which underwent some trials in Tilbury Docks in 1888, depended also on
the pulling in of cylinders (ten were employed, five on each side of the
vessel), for her submersion; the results were equally discouraging, and
some eminent men nearly lost their lives owing to the erratic behaviour
of this craft.
[Illustration:
THE SUBMARINE OF ANDRÉ CONSTANTIN.
(1874.)
]
No serious ship-constructor would nowadays think of adopting this method
of submersion, and we may therefore pass on to consider those which are
brought to the submerged condition by the admission of water into
special reservoirs or tanks.
Submarine boats so far as their immersion is concerned may be divided
into two classes.
1. Those which when submerged possess no floatability.
2. Those which in the same condition possess a small reserve buoyancy or
floatability.
Modern submarines almost without exception belong to the second
division, as this class has been found to possess great advantages over
the first.
1. SUBMARINES WITH NO FLOATABILITY WHEN SUBMERGED.
[Illustration:
“GOUBET II.”
]
Boats belonging to this division possess when submerged a total weight
equal to the weight of water displaced. During immersion it has been
found necessary to make the weight of the vessel and its contents
slightly exceed the weight of water displaced by the total volume of the
vessel; this excess of weight causes a downward motion which rapidly
accelerates unless checked, and care must be taken to regulate, either
automatically or otherwise, the depth, lest the vessel sink to a depth
where the pressure is greater than she can withstand.
[Illustration:
M. GOUBET ABOUT TO GO UNDER WATER IN HIS BOAT.
]
Although M. Goubet is a believer in the “no-floatability” idea, it has,
for some time past, been regarded with disfavour. Theoretically it is
possible to navigate a submarine whose total weight equals the weight of
water displaced so that she keeps at a given level without rising or
sinking, but the system will not work satisfactorily when put to severe
and prolonged tests. It is found to be impossible to obtain perfect
equality between the two weights: submarine currents, variations of
atmospheric pressure and temperature, and movements inside the boat all
tending to disturb its equilibrium.
2. SUBMARINES POSSESSING FLOATABILITY WHEN SUBMERGED.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account