Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [1st edition]Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse)
Religion
Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [1st edition]
Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse)
Church of England -- Controversial literature; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles
8. The present state of Subscription is also discreditable to the
English Church when we consider the position in which it leaves the
Bishops. Whoever wishes well to the institutions of his country, and
desires to promote the peaceful happiness of the people, will watchfully
cherish respect for all who are in authority. The Christian is taught to
consider them as ministers of God to us for good; and the clergy are
bound, not only by this universal sanction but also by their Ordination
vows, to reverence the Bishops of the Church; and any circumstance which
occasions a breach in this duty ought to be to them a cause for regret.
There is a popular error that a clergyman, when in doubt upon any
question of Christian faith or practice, has only to apply to his Bishop,
and that he has authority to settle the question. Some recent writers
have helped perhaps to foster this notion by their ill-considered
professions of entire deference to episcopal authority. No circumstance
has contributed so largely to expose the very limited extent of it as the
controversies of the present day. A Bishop, in fact, has scarcely any
discretionary power amongst the greater part of the clergy as to
questions of doctrine. He can refuse ordination to a candidate, or a
license to a curate, subject, however, to an appeal. If he should refuse
institution to a benefice, the civil courts would demand the reason. He
may institute a suit for heresy; and this must be proved by a reference
to the Scriptures and four general councils, not to the Articles or Book
of Prayer. Yet of late great deference to episcopal authority has been
expressed, and the Charges of Bishops have been anxiously looked for.
The manner in which they have been received by some exposes the
hollowness of the deference professed, the absence of the power supposed,
and the true reason for the anxiety to receive them. They are estimated
as the works of partizans in a controversy, not of judges in a cause.
They are extolled by those to whose opinions they lean; they are
criticized without reserve, and sometimes with very little respect, by
any who are dissatisfied with them. The truth is shown in all its
nakedness, that Bishops have no more _power_ on such questions than other
men, and less influence perhaps than some other writers.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account