Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [1st edition] — John Shaqi
Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [1st edition]Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse)
Religion
Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [1st edition]
Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse)
Church of England -- Controversial literature; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles
Whatever opinion may be now entertained of the tractarian party, the
praise of zeal, ability and piety cannot be denied to the leaders of it;
yet they are censured as disaffected to the Church, and their exclusion
not obscurely suggested. For some of their opinions the writer can be no
advocate. He believes them to have fallen into errors equally lamentable
and dangerous if persisted in: yet were the choice given him between such
instructors and others who pass uncondemned in ruinous indolence and
indifference, he would not hesitate in giving his preference to the
former. Nor, when he remembers the want of earnest men, and the
ever-varying forms of human opinion, can he hesitate in desiring their
continuance as ministers in our Church.
“We are not only uncertain of finding out truths, in matters
disputable, but we are certain that the best and ablest doctors of
Christendom have been actually deceived in matters of great
concernment; which thing is evident in all those instances of persons
from whose doctrines all sorts of Christians, respectively, take
liberty to dissent. The errors of Papias, Irenæus, Lactantius,
Justin Martyr, in the millenary opinion; of St. Cyprian, Firmilian,
the Asian and African fathers in the question of re-baptization; St.
Austin in his decretory and uncharitable sentence against the
unbaptized children of Christian parents; the Roman or the Greek
doctors in the question of the procession of the Holy Ghost, and in
the matter of images, are examples beyond exception. The errors that
attach to the minds of men are numberless. Now if these great
personages had been persecuted or destroyed for their opinions, who
should have answered the invaluable loss the Church should have
sustained in missing so excellent, so exemplary, and so great
lights?”
“Since those opinions were open and manifest to the world, that the
Church did not condemn them, it was either because those opinions
were by the Church not thought to be errors, or if they were, yet she
thought fit to tolerate the error and the erring person. And if she
would do so still, it would, in most cases, be better than now it
is.”—_Bishop Jeremy Taylor_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account