Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [2nd edition] — John Shaqi
Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [2nd edition]Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse)
Religion
Subscription the disgrace of the English Church [2nd edition]
Wodehouse, C. N. (Charles Nourse)
Church of England -- Controversial literature; Church of England. Thirty-nine Articles
The Bishops, in fact, are endeavouring to settle that which they have not
the power to settle—the meaning of Subscription, the interpretation of
the Articles, the true doctrine of the Church. And whoever in a public
station attempts to exercise a greater power than his office assigns,
exposes a weak point, perhaps before unnoticed, and instead of gaining
new authority, may lose a part of that long-established and deferential
respect, which is the most valuable part of all authority. A country
magistrate is discreetly silent when a case is brought before him which
the law does not empower him to decide, and abstains from lowering his
authority by an interference which may be disputed.
It is altogether unsound in theory, and utterly fruitless in practice, to
expect that points relating to doctrine can be settled by Episcopal
Charges dropping one by one from the press, and unconnected with each
other. The interpretation of a Confession of Faith or of the terms of
Subscription belongs to the Church in some way represented and convened.
An Episcopal Charge is pastoral advice. When there is in the Church a
proper authority to legislate or interpret, that advice will be received
with respect and thankfulness, and contribute much in directing the minds
of men to a right decision, which is its proper office. But when it
usurps the province of a judge or legislator, or from circumstances is
improperly brought to stand in their place, it will only provoke the
opposition we now witness, and ultimately lose a part of that just
deference which it ought ever to receive. The recollection that there is
no Convocation or other Ecclesiastical Body competent to settle the
perplexing questions recently agitated, may have induced the Bishops
charitably to venture upon a forlorn hope. Their Charges, however, are
powerless in the attempt; and however thankful numbers are to receive
their pastoral advice, yet when we observe the boundless liberty of
reply, and the entire want of authority to enforce their conclusions,
respect for the episcopal office almost suggests the wish that in these
days they were not published.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account