In the great Military Hospitals, of Roman-Catholic countries, intelligent, well-behaved, Army Surgeons, while explaining everything with thorough business-like precision, if spoken to of the Paris Army Hospitals, before the recently introduced Sœurs de St. Vincent served there, and asked what they think upon the whole of the service of women in Army Hospitals--after a little hesitation, and being urged to speak plainly, will generally say that they prefer in Civil Hospitals the service of Sœurs to those of hired nurses--but they deprecate either Sisters or any women in Military Hospitals. 1. Because the presence of women, however virtuous and guarded, would excite passions and produce unfavourable results in many cases. 2. Because they were unnecessary, the Orderlies being efficient, faithful, kind, and sufficient. Of the second reason one can judge nothing by a walk through a hospital, as it does not always follow that what the master says is enough is so--though this is one of the mysteries it is good to know and not good to reveal. Of the first there is no doubt. The question remains, striking the balance of good and evil--Do chaste, guarded, and efficient nurses on the whole contribute more to the economy of human life, the order, cleanliness, and decency of a Military Hospital than they do harm? Possibly the former effects are usual and general; the latter exceptional and rare: after all, most soldiers are men and not beasts. But it is well and necessary to bear in mind both the existence of this danger, and the exaggerated fears many Army Surgeons conscientiously as well as unconscientiously have of it. I therefore very earnestly hope that the work will not be encumbered, at first at all events, with the charge of the venereal wards. And it is most important, for the favourable result of the anxious and difficult experiment about to be made, of permanently introducing female service into Army Hospitals, that we should be quite clear of the convalescent patients, and should only attend patients severely ill or severely injured. [Sidenote: 4. Pay and Rations.] 4. PAY AND RATIONS.--In the great Civil Hospitals the Head-Nurses have, on an average, 50_l._ a-year, no board, an allowance of fuel and light, and the use of one or two, generally unfurnished, rooms. The Assistant-Nurses, on an average, receive about 12_s._ a-week, [£31 per annum] no board, lodging, with the use of some furniture, sometimes an allowance of fuel and light, apart from the use of both in the wards. Both Guy’s and St. Bartholomew’s Hospitals now give partial board to the Assistant-Nurses, and St. Thomas’s is about to adopt the same plan. St. Mary’s Hospital gives board to both Head and Assistant-Nurses.