Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii: KU. Vol 1 No 23Setzer, Henry W.
Science
Subspeciation in the Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ordii: KU. Vol 1 No 23
Setzer, Henry W.
Kangaroo rats
_Remarks._--Trowbridge and Whitaker named this kangaroo rat as a full
species. The diagnostic characters were the length and breadth of the
rostrum and the relatively great inflation of the auditory bullae. Also,
_Dipodomys oklahomae_ was not known to intergrade with any other named
kinds. Davis (1942:332) treated _D. oklahomae_ as a subspecies of the
earlier named species _Dipodomys ordii_. Certain characters in specimens
from the type series of both _D. o. richardsoni_ and _D. oklahomae_,
such as the shape and configuration of the nasals, the over-all
proportion of the skull, tooth pattern and body proportions through
individual variation overlap and indicate that these two groups of
animals belong to the same species, even though animals from
intermediate geographic areas are not available to show actual
intergradation. My findings corroborate Davis' conclusion that _D.
oklahomae_ should stand as _Dipodomys ordii oklahomae_. In spite of the
great similarities shown by the two groups of animals there are still
sufficient diagnostic characters between the two groups to enable them
to be segregated easily as valid subspecies.
_Dipodomys ordii oklahomae_ is, for some unknown reason, restricted to a
limited geographic range. Specimens examined from the upper reaches of
the South Canadian River, farther westward, are all referable to _D. o.
richardsoni_ rather than, as would be expected, to _D. o. oklahomae_
since the habitat for these animals is continuous from the type locality
of _D. o. oklahomae_ to the upper reaches of the South Canadian River.
In length and shape of the nasals, degree of inflation of the auditory
bullae and width of the interorbital region these specimens from the
upper reaches of the South Canadian River are intergrades between _D. o.
richardsoni_ and _D. o. medius_. The range of _D. o. medius_ lies to the
south of that of _D. o. richardsoni_ and to the southwest of that of _D.
o. oklahomae_.
The present range of _D. o. oklahomae_, as now understood, is the
most eastern part of the range of the species _Dipodomys ordii_ and
of the genus _Dipodomys_. The existence of _D. o. oklahomae_ in this
area is a precarious one since its habitat is limited in extent and is
periodically flooded.
Although no specimens are known from the area where intergradation
between _D. o. oklahomae_ and _D. o. richardsoni_ would be expected
to occur, it would seem that when animals from this region
become available, intergradation will be shown to occur.
_Specimens examined._--Total, 8, all from Oklahoma, distributed as
follows: _Grady County_: 4 mi. N Minco, 1 (USBS). _Cleveland
County_: 2-1/4 mi. S Norman, 7 (6 OU; 1 USBS).
=Dipodomys ordii compactus= True
_Dipodomys compactus_ True, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., 11:160, January
5, 1889.
_Cricetodipus compactus_, Trouessart, Catalogus Mammalium, 1:581,
1897.
_Perodipus compactus_, Elliot, Field Columbian Museum, Zool. Ser.,
2:240, 1901.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account