Substance of a Sermon on the Bible Society: preached at Beccles, October 29th, and at St. Mary's Church Bungay, on Friday, Dec. 1st, 1815Cunningham, Francis
Religion
Substance of a Sermon on the Bible Society: preached at Beccles, October 29th, and at St. Mary's Church Bungay, on Friday, Dec. 1st, 1815
Cunningham, Francis
British and Foreign Bible Society
I cannot in a Christian congregation for a moment suppose that any
command of our Lord can be disputed; I need, therefore, scarcely feel
that it is necessary to do much more than to take for granted that it is
one of the great leading duties of every Christian, to spread abroad this
gospel, or in other words, to promote the circulation of the Scriptures.
What can be the objection to circulating the simple word of God? Is it
that some work ought to accompany it, in order to protect, or give it a
right application? The command of our Lord has no limitation of this
kind. “Go” says my text “and preach the gospel;” (this gospel which the
apostles have delivered down to us in the Scriptures,) “go and preach it
to every creature.” Is an objection started that _all_ the word of God
ought not to be circulated, that some part of it is needless, some
unintelligible? We have in answer to this, the words of an apostle, who
declares to us that “_all_ Scripture is given by inspiration from God,
and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness.” Thank God that very few have started the
notion, that the Scriptures alone should not be spread abroad, and it
seems to me wonderful that any should presume to determine, that what God
has sent forth for the salvation of mankind, is not sufficient for that
purpose, or would, without the assistance of the works of fallible men,
lead his creatures into error. As _Christians_ then, we must admit that
the Scriptures should be universally circulated. We are also called upon
to circulate them as members of a _Protestant_ church; for we must not
forget, that in distinction from those, from whom we as a church
dissented, that the great maxim upon which our fathers acted, and for
which so many of them gave up their lives, was “that the Bible, and the
Bible alone is the religion of Protestants.” As _Protestants_ therefore
we are called upon to circulate the word of God. As members also of the
_Church of England_, we are bound to engage in the same work. Our church
has called herself the daughter of the Bible. This was the holy origin
from which it was all its boast to have sprung. Our church certainly had
its origin at a time, when, of all others in this country, the Bible was
the best understood, and was the most simply interpreted; it was
constructed moreover by men who with their blood, sealed the commentary
which they made upon the Scriptures, when they compiled the liturgy,
articles, and discipline of our establishment. Whether then we come to
the consideration of the question of distributing the sacred Scriptures
without note or comment, as _Christians_, as _Protestants_, or as
_members of the established Church_, we must admit that it is our duty,
our high and bounden duty to do it; and, as the apostle said, “Woe is me
if I preach not the gospel,” so we must say, Woe is me, if I do not, as
much as in me lies, seek to give the Bible to every creature. The
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account