French fiction -- 20th century -- Translations into English
Preceded by a reputation of the American kind, flashy, but substantial,
and based on indisputable realities, he had come back to Paris seven or
eight years before. The support of his patron, bringing official favor
with it in the wake of his insolent dollars, had opened a way for him in
spite of the triple barriers piled up by routine, jealousy and the just
rights of those who had been long awaiting their turn to enter. Whether
it was just or not, he was advanced over them all. Philippe had not
permitted himself to accept any honors or advantages he had not
deserved; but, knowing that he deserved them, he did not trouble himself
about the means by which he got them. He despised men too much not to
borrow their own contemptible weapons, when it was necessary, in order
to get the better of them. He did not despise a newspaper puff that
pierced people's ears like the brass instruments that used to accompany
the village tooth-pullers on their platforms. He was a great man for
fashionable exhibitions, first nights, varnishing-days, official galas.
He lent himself to sensational interviews. He himself wrote--one is
never served better than by oneself--and, through one or two examples,
showed those who contradicted him that he could handle the pen as well
as the knife. A counsel for amateurs! . . . Never be ambiguous! His way
of holding out his hand meant, "Alliance or war?" He allowed no means to
escape him by being neutral.
At the same time, a habit of working desperately, with no more
consideration for himself than he had for others, an indifference to
risks, brilliant results that could not be denied, made the internes in
the hospital he directed his enthusiastic partisans. He indulged in rash
communications to the Academy that aroused the exasperated incredulity
of comfortably settled souls who did not like to be turned upside down:
Homeric jousts from which he almost always emerged with the decisive
word and always with the last one.
He terrified the timid. He had no regard for individuals when the
interests of science or humanity seemed to him at stake. He would have
liked to experiment on criminals, destroy monsters, sterilize the
abnormal, undertake heroic operations on living subjects. He loathed
sentimentality. He did not give way to sympathy with his patients, and
he did not allow them to pity themselves. Their groans had no interest
for him. But when he was able to save them he did save them--harshly; he
cut down to the quick to cure the living man. He was hard of heart, but
his hands were gentle. People were afraid of him and they pursued him.
He fleeced the rich and asked nothing of the poor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account