Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
isolated region, anxious to achieve riches and honour by some
great exploit. Now it happens that an ambassador from the
Hsiung-nu arrived in this kingdom only a few days ago, and the
result is that the respectful courtesy extended towards us by our
royal host has disappeared. Should this envoy prevail upon him to
seize our party and hand us over to the Hsiung-nu, our bones will
become food for the wolves of the desert. What are we to do?’ With
one accord, the officers replied: ‘_Standing as we do in peril of
our lives, we will follow our commander through life and death_’
(今在危亡之地死生從司馬).” For the sequel of this adventure, see
chap. XII. § 1, note.
52. 是故不知諸侯之謀者不能預交不知山林險阻沮澤之形者不能行軍不用鄉導者不能得地利
We cannot enter into alliance with neighbouring princes until we are
acquainted with their designs. We are not fit to lead an army on
the march unless we are familiar with the face of the country—its
mountains and forests, its pitfalls and precipices, its marshes and
swamps. We shall be unable to turn natural advantages to account
unless we make use of local guides.
These three sentences are repeated from VII. §§ 12–14—in order
to emphasise their importance, the commentators seem to think. I
prefer to regard them as interpolated here in order to form an
antecedent to the following words. With regard to local guides,
Sun Tzŭ might have added that there is always the risk of going
wrong, either through their treachery or some misunderstanding
such as Livy records (XXII. 13): Hannibal, we are told, ordered a
guide to lead him into the neighbourhood of Casinum, where there
was an important pass to be occupied; but his Carthaginian accent,
unsuited to the pronunciation of Latin names, caused the guide to
understand Casilinum instead of Casinum, and turning from his
proper route, he took the army in that direction, the mistake not
being discovered until they had almost arrived.
53. 四五者不知一非霸王之兵也
To be ignorant of any one of the following four or five principles
Referring, I think, to what is contained in §§ 54, 55. Ts‘ao Kung,
thinking perhaps of the 五利 in VIII. § 6, takes them to be 九地之
利害 “the advantages and disadvantages attendant on the nine
varieties of ground.” The _T‘u Shu_ reads 此五者.
does not befit a warlike prince.
霸王, “one who rules by force,” was a term specially used for those
princes who established their hegemony over other feudal states.
The famous 五霸 of the 7th century B.C. were (1) 齊桓公 Duke Huan
of Ch‘i, (2) 晉文公 Duke Wên of Chin, (3) 宋襄公 Duke Hsiang of Sung,
(4) 楚莊王 Prince Chuang of Ch‘u, (5) 秦穆公 Duke Mu of Ch‘in. Their
reigns covered the period 685–591 B.C.
54. 夫霸王之兵伐大國則其衆不得聚威加於敵則其交不得合
When a warlike prince attacks a powerful state, his generalship shows
itself in preventing the concentration of the enemy’s forces. He
overawes his opponents,
Here and in the next sentence, the _Yü Lan_ inserts 家 after 敵.
and their allies are prevented from joining against him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account