Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
Mei Yao-ch‘ên constructs one of the chains of reasoning that are
so much affected by the Chinese: “In attacking a powerful state,
if you can divide her forces, you will have a superiority in
strength; if you have a superiority in strength, you will overawe
the enemy; if you overawe the enemy, the neighbouring states will
be frightened; and if the neighbouring states are frightened, the
enemy’s allies will be prevented from joining her.” The following
gives a stronger meaning to 威加: 若大國一敗則小國離而不聚矣 “If the
great state has once been defeated (before she has had time to
summon her allies), then the lesser states will hold aloof and
refrain from massing their forces.” Ch‘ên Hao and Chang Yü take
the sentence in quite another way. The former says: “Powerful
though a prince may be, if he attacks a large state, he will be
unable to raise enough troops, and must rely to some extent on
external aid; if he dispenses with this, and with overweening
confidence in his own strength, simply tries to intimidate the
enemy, he will surely be defeated.” Chang Yü puts his view thus:
“If we recklessly attack a large state, our own people will be
discontented and hang back. But if (as will then be the case) our
display of military force is inferior by half to that of the
enemy, the other chieftains will take fright and refuse to join
us.” According to this interpretation, 其 would refer, not to the
大國, but to the 霸王 himself.
55. 是故不爭天下之交不養天下之權信己之私威加於敵故其城可拔其國可隳
Hence he does not strive
For 爭 the _Yü Lan_ reads 事.
to ally himself with all and sundry,
天下, as in § 6, stands for 諸侯 “the feudal princes,” or the
states ruled by them.
nor does he foster the power of other states. He carries out his own
secret designs,
For 信 (read _shên_^1) in the meaning of 伸, cf. VIII. § 8. The
commentators are unanimous on this point, and we must therefore
beware of translating 信己之私 by “secretly self-confident” or the
like. Capt. Calthrop (omitting 之私) has: “he has confidence in
himself.”
keeping his antagonists in awe.
The train of thought appears to be this: Secure against a
combination of his enemies. 能絶天下之交惟得伸己之私志威而無外交者 “he
can afford to reject entangling alliances and simply pursue his
own secret designs, his prestige enabling him to dispense with
external friendships.” (Li Ch‘üan.)
Thus he is able to capture their cities and overthrow their kingdoms.
This paragraph, though written many years before the Ch‘in State
became a serious menace, is not a bad summary of the policy by
which the famous Six Chancellors gradually paved the way for her
final triumph under Shih Huang Ti. Chang Yü, following up his
previous note, thinks that Sun Tzŭ is condemning this attitude of
cold-blooded selfishness and haughty isolation. He again refers 其
to the warlike prince, thus making it appear that in the end he is
bound to succumb.
56. 施無法之賞懸無政之令犯三軍之衆若使一人
Bestow rewards without regard to rule,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account