Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World — John Shaqi
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
Capt. Calthrop’s rendering is: “They who are the first to lay
their hands on more than ten of the enemy’s chariots, should be
encouraged.” We should have expected the gallant captain to see
that such Samson-like prowess deserved something more substantial
than mere encouragement. The _T‘u Shu_ omits 故, and has 以上 in place
of the more archaic 已上.
Our own flags should be substituted for those of the enemy, and the
chariots mingled and used in conjunction with ours. The captured
soldiers should be kindly treated and kept.
18. 是謂勝敵而益强
This is called, using the conquered foe to augment one’s own strength.
19. 故兵貴勝不貴久
In war, then, let your great object be victory, not lengthy campaigns.
As Ho Shih remarks: 兵不可玩武不可黷 “Soldiers are not to be used as
playthings. War is not a thing to be trifled with.” Sun Tzŭ here
reiterates the main lesson which this chapter is intended to enforce.
20. 故知兵之將民之司命國家安危之主也
Thus it may be known that the leader of armies is the arbiter of the
people’s fate, the man on whom it depends whether the nation shall be
in peace or in peril.
In the original text, there is a 生 before the 民.
III. 謀攻篇
ATTACK BY STRATAGEM.
1. 孫子曰凡用兵之法全國爲上破國次之全軍爲上破軍次之全旅爲上破旅次之全卒爲上破卒次
之全伍爲上破伍次之
Sun Tzŭ said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to
take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it
is not so good. So, too, it is better to capture an army entire than
to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire
than to destroy them.
A 軍 “army corps,” according to the _Ssŭ-ma Fa_, consisted nominally
of 12500 men; according to Ts‘ao Kung, a 旅 contained 500 men, a 卒
any number between 100 and 500, and a 伍 any number between 5 and
100. For the last two, however, Chang Yü gives the exact figures
of 100 and 5 respectively.
2. 是故百戰百勝非善之善者也不戰而屈人之兵善之善者也
Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme
excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s
resistance without fighting.
Here again, no modern strategist but will approve the words of the
old Chinese general. Moltke’s greatest triumph, the capitulation
of the huge French army at Sedan, was won practically without
bloodshed.
3. 故上兵伐謀其次伐交其次伐兵下政攻城
Thus the highest form of generalship is to baulk the enemy’s plans;
I.e., as Li Ch‘üan says (伐其始謀也), in their very inception.
Perhaps the word “baulk” falls short of expressing the full force
of 伐, which implies not an attitude of defence, whereby one might
be content to foil the enemy’s stratagems one after another, but
an active policy of counter-attack. Ho Shih puts this very clearly
in his note: “When the enemy has made a plan of attack against us,
we must anticipate him by delivering our own attack first.”
the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy’s forces;
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account