Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the WorldSunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Philosophy
Sun Tzŭ on the Art of War: The Oldest Military Treatise in the World
Sunzi, active 6th century B.C.
Military art and science -- Early works to 1800; War -- Early works to 1800
That this is the meaning, may be gathered from Tu Mu’s note:
開土拓境則分割與有功者. The 三略 gives the same advice: 𫉬地裂之. 廓
means “to enlarge” or “extend”—at the expense of the enemy,
understood. Cf. _Shih Ching_, III. 1. vii. 1: 憎其式廓 “hating all
the great States.” Ch‘ên Hao also says 屯兵種蒔 “quarter your
soldiers on the land, and let them sow and plant it.” It is by
acting on this principle, and harvesting the lands they invaded,
that the Chinese have succeeded in carrying out some of their most
memorable and triumphant expeditions, such as that of 班超 Pan
Ch‘ao who penetrated to the Caspian, and in more recent years,
those of 福康安 Fu-k‘ang-an and 左宗棠 Tso Tsung-t‘ang.
21. 懸權而動
Ponder and deliberate
Note that both these words, like the Chinese 懸權, are really
metaphors derived from the use of scales.
before you make a move.
Chang Yü quotes 尉繚子 as saying that we must not break camp until
we have gauged the resisting power of the enemy and the cleverness
of the opposing general. Cf. the “seven comparisons” in I. § 13.
Capt. Calthrop omits this sentence.
22. 先知迂直之計者勝此軍爭之法也
He will conquer who has learnt the artifice of deviation.
See _supra_, §§ 3, 4.
Such is the art of manœuvring.
With these words, the chapter would naturally come to an end. But
there now follows a long appendix in the shape of an extract from
an earlier book on War, now lost, but apparently extant at the
time when Sun Tzŭ wrote. The style of this fragment is not
noticeably different from that of Sun Tzŭ himself, but no
commentator raises a doubt as to its genuineness.
23. 軍政曰言不相聞故爲金鼓視不相見故爲旌旗
The Book of Army Management says:
It is perhaps significant that none of the earlier commentators
give us any information about this work. Mei Yao-ch‘ên calls it
軍之舊典 “an ancient military classic,” and Wang Hsi, 古軍書 “an old
book on war.” Considering the enormous amount of fighting that had
gone on for centuries before Sun Tzŭ’s time between the various
kingdoms and principalities of China, it is not in itself
improbable that a collection of military maxims should have been
made and written down at some earlier period.
On the field of battle,
Implied, though not actually in the Chinese.
the spoken word does not carry far enough: hence the institution of
gongs and drums.
I have retained the words 金鼓 of the original text, which recur in
the next paragraph, in preference to the other reading 鼓鐸 “drums
and bells,” which is found in the _T‘ung Tien_, _Pei T‘ang Shu
Ch‘ao_ and _Yü Lan_. 鐸 is a bell with a clapper. See _Lun Yü_ III.
24, _Chou Li_ XXIX. 15, 29. 金 of course would include both gongs
and bells of every kind. The _T‘u Shu_ inserts a 之 after each 爲.
Nor can ordinary objects be seen clearly enough: hence the institution
of banners and flags.
24. 夫金鼓旌旗者所以一民之耳目也
Gongs and drums, banners and flags, are means whereby the ears and
eyes of the host
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account