Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman TimesMilne, John Stewart
History
Surgical Instruments in Greek and Roman Times
Milne, John Stewart
Surgery -- History; Surgical instruments and apparatus
J. Corbet Anderson, in _The Roman City at Wroxeter_, p. 92, says it was
embedded in the remains of a case in which it had been carried, and he
gives an illustration of it (Pl. VII, fig. 5). A similar object is
classified as a surgical instrument in the Louvre, but both these articles
are I believe detached mirror handles. The passage quoted from Hippocrates
shows that the ordinary phlebotome was not guarded in this way. A
phlebotome of the principle of the fleam is figured by Albucasis and the
method of using it in dividing the frontal vein by striking it with a comb
is described. There is also a similar instrument in the Naples Museum,
from Pompeii, which is classed as a veterinary instrument (Pl. VIII, fig.
3). It is probable, however, that such an instrument was used by Roman
physicians, as the offices of surgeon and veterinarian were often held by
the same individual in Roman times. It is not unlikely that the method is
referred to by Antyllus in the passage beginning--ποτὲ μὲν καταπείροντες
ποτὲ δὲ ἀναπείροντες φλεβοτοῦμεν (Oribasius, _Collect._ VII. x).
This passage describing the technique of phlebotomy has given rise to
great and voluminous discussion (see Daremberg's Oribas. vol. ii. p. 776)
from the fact that Antyllus goes on to state that we operate
καταπείροντες--cutting inwards--in cases where the vessels are deep, and
ἀναπείροντες--cutting outwards--where the vessels are superficial, and the
advice has seemed to most commentators to be the reverse of what one would
expect. The explanation seems to me to be simple. Superficial vessels are
those which could be seen standing out on applying the fillet, and were to
be divided by the method in vogue at the present day by transfixing the
vessel through its middle and bringing the lancet outwards. The reason of
this is that the danger of injuring important structures lying deep to the
vein was well understood by the ancients. Thus Galen warns against
wounding the nerve in phlebotomy of the median, the tendon of the biceps
in phlebotomy of the scapulo-cephalic, the artery in dividing the basilic,
and so on. But in opening deep-lying veins the method of transfixing was
inapplicable, and the bone was cut boldly down upon till the issue of
blood showed that the vein was opened. The deep vessels which were divided
were those about the scalp, and as they had no important relations they
were divided by cutting through everything overlying the bone, often with
razor-shaped knives. Thus Paulus Aegineta (VI. vii) says: 'When many deep
vessels send a copious defluxion to the eyes we have recourse to the
operation called Periscyphismus.' This consisted in making a transverse
incision down to the bone over the vertex from one temple to the other.
_The 'Katias.'_
Κατιάς -ιάδος (ἡ) (Soranus, II. xviii); καθιάς (Paul, VI. lxxiv);
κατιάδιον (τό) (Aetius, II. iii. 2); κατειάδιον (τό) (Aretaeus, _Cur.
Morb. Diut._ i. 2).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account