Napoleonic Wars, 1800-1815 -- Fiction; War stories
"I should think you weren't seven years old at the time," he said in a
judicial tone. "When I first came into Italy with the vaccine, you know,
Sir Charles's marriage was still being talked about in Florence. I
remember it perfectly though it seems as if it had all happened in
another world. Yes, indubitably he died of hunger like ten thousand
other Genoese. He couldn't go out to hunt for garbage with the populace
or crawl out at night trying to gather nettles in the ditches outside
the forts, and nobody would have known that he was dead for a month if
one of the bombs out of a bomb-vessel with Admiral Keith's blockading
squadron hadn't burst the door in. They found him at the foot of the
stairs, and, they say, with a lot of gold pieces in his pockets. But
nobody cared much for that. If it had been a lot of half-gnawed bones
there would have been blood spilt, no doubt. For all I know there were
or may be even now secret places full of gold in the thickness of these
walls. However, the body was thrown into a corpse-cart and the
authorities boarded the doorway. It remained boarded for years because
the heirs didn't care to have anything to do with that shell of a
palace. I fancy that the last of them died in the snows of Russia.
Cantelucci came along, and owing to a friendship with some sort of
scribe in the Municipality he got permission to use the place for his
hostelry. He told me that he found several half ducats in the corners of
the hall when he took possession. I suppose they paid for the whitewash,
for I can't believe that Cantelucci had much money in his pockets."
"Perhaps he found one of those secret hiding-places of which you spoke,"
suggested Cosmo.
"What? Cantelucci? He never looked for any gold. He is too much in the
clouds; but he has made us dine well in the palace of the starved man,
hasn't he? Sixteen years ago in Naples he was a Jacobin and a friend of
the French, a rebel, a traitor to his king if you like--but he has a
good memory, there is no denying that."
"Is he a Neapolitan, then?" asked Cosmo. "I imagined they were of a
different type."
"God only knows. He was there and I didn't ask him. He was a prisoner of
the royalists, of the reactionaries. I was much younger then and perhaps
more humane. Flesh and blood couldn't stand in the sight of the way in
which they were being treated, men of position, of attainments, of
intelligence. The Neapolitan Jacobins were no populace. They were men of
character and ideas, the pick of all classes. They were properly
liberals. Still they were called Jacobins and you may be surprised that
I, a professional man and an Englishman . . ."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account