Sweet Hampstead and Its AssociationsWhite, Caroline A.
History
Sweet Hampstead and Its Associations
White, Caroline A.
Hampstead (London, England) -- History
But the then Lord of the Manor was not living for posterity, but for
himself. In the May previous to the meeting we have mentioned, without
even the courtesy of giving the usual notice to the copyholders, Sir
Thomas Wilson had brought his Estate Bill before Parliament, by which he
sought to abrogate the privileges of the copyholders, and appropriate
to himself the power of granting licenses to improve their customary
estates, and licenses to get materials for that purpose from their own
copyholds, upon payment of 40s. fine to the Lord of the Manor, and £3 3s.
fee to the steward for every such license. The Bill also sought power to
grant building leases of the Heath, or other wastes of the manor, and to
extend the power of granting building leases over certain lands formerly
part of the waste, which were granted by the Lord of the Manor to
himself, in the name of a trustee, with the consent of the homage, upon
the express condition _that no buildings should at any time be erected on
them_.
It was by mere accident, it is said, that the people of Hampstead heard
of this Bill being before the House, and only just in time to oppose its
being carried through surreptitiously.
No wonder that there were meetings in hot haste, and resolutions passed
to defend the rights and privileges of the freeholders and copyholders,
and at the same time those of the inhabitants and visitors. The
sympathy of the public, as well as of the principal residents in the
neighbourhood, was with them. Lord Clifton favoured the opposition. Lord
Mansfield headed the subscription, as we have elsewhere said, with a
donation of £50.
The inhabitants, well aware how much of their prosperity was due to the
natural beauty of the Heath and its surroundings, gave with no niggard
hands towards the fund for its protection. But, as we subsequently learn,
the £3,000 raised by voluntary contributions was expended with no other
result than the prospect of endless litigation.
It was impossible for this state of things to exist without a certain
degree of personal ill-feeling being imported into it. Sir Thomas was
rich and resolute, but the copyholders had their rights, and determined
to hold by them. The years ran on without any radical adjustment of the
questions at issue.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account