Sweet Hampstead and Its AssociationsWhite, Caroline A.
History
Sweet Hampstead and Its Associations
White, Caroline A.
Hampstead (London, England) -- History
Meanwhile the monuments and mural tablets within the demolished Chapel
of St. Mary were necessarily displaced, and have not, Mr. Howitt tells
us, ‘found their way back to the depositors they marked, and the memory
of which they were intended to perpetuate.’
The design of the church was furnished by a resident architect, Mr.
Flitcroft,[68] ‘Burlington Harry,’ as he was familiarly called from
circumstances elsewhere referred to; and the building entrusted to a
resident builder, Mr. Saunderson, who was not, it appears, able to
follow the original design of the church (the spire of which was very
handsome) for want of funds. A note in the trust book, 1744, relating to
the building of the church, throws a strong light on Mr. Saunderson’s
dilemma, and the small importance of architectural beauty, or even
propriety, in the minds of the trustees of that period.
‘The tower, being placed at the eastern end of the church, would be a
considerable saving of expense.’ As a result of this saving, the church
appears the wrong side before, with the tower and belfry at the east end,
and the chancel at the west. You pass the altar on entering, and the font
is at the further end. There is an altar-piece, but no east window, and
the whole is further darkened by galleries north and south. Park says it
is a neat but ill-designed church, and we can only repeat what Park says.
An engraving of the old church (said to be from an oil painting by
Grisoni) in Park’s ‘History of Hampstead’ represents a picturesquely
irregular rustic building, with low walls, rather high-pitched roofs,
sharply-pointed gables, and a small open timber bell-tower. It has
dormers in the roof, a square mullioned window in one gable, a different
sized one in another, and other lights thrown in anywhere. A transverse
addition forms the whole into an irregular cruciform structure.
Trees crowd around it at the west end, as they do at the present day, and
in the graveyard are several recognisable monuments, notably that above
the burial-place of the Delamere family; of Daniel Bedingfield, Clerk
of the Parliament, 1637; of —— Popple, Esq., Secretary of the Board of
Trade, 1722. A flat stone (recut since its discovery), beside the second
pathway to the left on entering, bears the date of the Great Fire, 1666.
There is also that of John Harrison, the inventor of the chronometer, who
died March 24, 1776, after sixty years’ application to the improvement of
watches and clocks, and of whom Mrs. Montague, writing to her brother,
Mr. Robinson, from London, May 28, 1762, observes: ‘Mr. Harrison’s
watch’ (the fourth, Dr. Doran says), ‘and most perfect timekeeper for
ascertaining the longitude at sea’ (and for which he ultimately received
£2,400), ‘has succeeded beyond expectation. Navigation will be improved
by it, which all who have the spirit of travelling shall rejoice at.’[69]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account