Sweethearts at HomeCrockett, S. R. (Samuel Rutherford)
General
Sweethearts at Home
Crockett, S. R. (Samuel Rutherford)
Girls -- Diaries
Then I said, "Mir-row, you are a horrid nasty cat, and you don't deserve
that you should get off breaking that Delhi Vase. But I will take the
blame on myself--yes, I will--just to show you what it is to be noble.
_I_ will go up-stairs and 'fess.'"
So I said, "Get thee behind me, Mir-row!" as I ought to have done at
first. Because Mir-row had always been so naughty that she tempted me to
blame her for breaking it. If she had been a good cat, then such a thing
would never have entered my head. But her character was against her.
You see, I knew that I had only to say, "Mir-row did it," to get
believed. Because she was always doing wicked things like that.
Then I went up-stairs, running as hard as I could to get away from the
wicked Mir-row, who was tempting me to tell a story. I ran to find
Somebody to 'fess' to. And I found Somebody. And Somebody listened, and
then rose up looking quite grave, but very kind. Oh, I was shaking ever
so, till Somebody took me in such nice strong arms, and said that as I
had come at once, and had not even thought of trying to escape the blame
or to put it on anybody else, I should not be punished--though it
certainly _was_ a great, great pity.
But I never told about Mir-row, or how nearly it had happened otherwise.
And as for Mir-row, she said nothing either. She just curled herself up
on the carpet among the broken pieces of the vase, and when we went down
was peacefully dreaming of catching mice. I knew she was by the way she
had of thrusting out her claws and pulling them in again.
No, Mir-row did not deserve all that I had done for her.
But, after all, honesty is a better policy than blaming things on
Mir-row.
This is the story of my first temptation, and how I was saved from the
wickedness of Mir-row.
II
PURPLE "THINKS"
_June again. Aged ten. Afternoon of the Day when the first Strawberry
was Half-ripe._
It will never be whole-ripe, owing to an accident which happened to it.
However, none of the Grown-ups knew except Sandy the gardener, and he
only tells us not to. But we don't really mind.
Which makes me wonder sometimes if Grown-ups have a world of their own,
same as us Children. I don't think so. If they had, they wouldn't always
be writing and reading, or paying calls and sitting on chairs, and
looking Nim-Pim-Pimmany! They can't really have good times all by
themselves, same as us. What do you think? I suppose it is
account-books, and postmen, and having to understand the sermon that
makes them look like that.
But at any rate they have not an idea that children really are
thinking--nor how much they know. Perhaps that is just as well. For, as
they say about the monkeys, if they only knew how we talk among
ourselves, they might set us to work. At least they would not be so
ready to believe in us when next they saw us with our "behaving faces"
on.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account