Swetnam, the Woman-hater, arraigned by women: A new comedie, acted at the Red Bull, by the late Queenes seruants. — John Shaqi
Swetnam, the Woman-hater, arraigned by women: A new comedie, acted at the Red Bull, by the late Queenes seruants.Anonymous
General
Swetnam, the Woman-hater, arraigned by women: A new comedie, acted at the Red Bull, by the late Queenes seruants.
Anonymous
Swetnam, Joseph, active 1617 -- Drama
By this hand, I shall thinke my money well bestowed then: but to tell
you the truth, Sir, the reason I would learne, is, because I am to bee
married shortly: and they say, Then or neuer, is the time for a man to
get the mastery.
_Mis._ How, marry, Scholer? thou art not mad, I hope. Doe you know
what you doe?
_Scan._ I know what I shall doe, Master, that’s as good.
_Mis._ Doe you know what she is you are to marrie?
_Scan._ A woman, I am sure a that.
_Mis._ No, she’s a Deuill, Harpie, Cockatrice.
_Scan._ And you were not my Master——
_Mis._ Scholer, be aduised, they are all
Most vile and wicked.
_Scan._ How, Sir?
_Mis._ Dissemblers, the very curse of man, Monsters indeed.
_Clow._ That Ile be sworne they are, for I haue knowne some of vm,
that ha’ deuoured you three Lordships, in Cullices and Caudles before
Break-fast.
_Mis._ And creatures the most imperfect: for looke yee, Sir,
Th’are nothing of themselues,
Onely patcht vp to coozen and gull men,
Borrowing their haire from one, complexions from another,
Nothing their own that’s pleasing, all dissembled,
Not so much, but their very breath
Is sophisticated with Amber-pellets, and kissing causes.
Marry a woman, Scholer? thou vndergo’st an harder task,
Then those bold Spirits, that did vndertake
To steale the great _Turke_ into Christendome.
A woman! she’s an Angell at ten, a Saint at fifteene,
A Deuill at fortie, and a Witch at fourescore.
If you will marry, marry none of these:
Neither the faire, nor the foule; the rich, nor the poore;
The good, nor the bad.
_Scan._ Who should I marry then, Sir?
_Mis._ Marry none at all.
_Scan._ Proceeds this from Experience?
_Mis._ From Reason, Sir, the Mistris of Experience.
Happy were man, had woman neuer bin.
Why did not Nature infuse the gift of Procreation
In man alone, without the helpe of woman,
Euen as we see one seed, produce another?
_Clow._ Or as you see one Knaue make twentie, Master.
_Mis._ Thou saist true, _Swash_: or why might not a man
Reuiue againe, like to the Elme and Oake?
_Clow._ Many Logger-heads doe, Sir.
_Mis._ When they are cut downe to the very roote,
Yet in short time you see, young branches spring againe.
_Clow._ If ’twere so at Tyburne, what a fine companie
of Crack-ropes would spring vp then?
_Mis._ Then we should ne’r be acquainted with the deceitfull deuices
of a womans crooked conditions, which are so many, that if all the
World were Paper, the Sea, Inke, Trees and Plants, Pens, and euery man
Clarkes, Scribes, and Notaries: yet would all that Paper be scribled
ouer, the Inke wasted, Pens worne to the stumps, and all the
Scriueners wearie, before they could describe the hundreth part of a
womans wickednesse.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account