If we think of a certain Class, and imagine that we have picked out from
it a certain smaller Class, it is evident that the _Remainder_ of the
large Class does _not_ possess the Differentia of that smaller Class.
Hence it may be regarded as _another_ smaller Class, whose Differentia
may be formed, from that of the Class first picked out, by prefixing the
word "not"; and we may imagine that we have _divided_ the Class first
thought of into _two_ smaller Classes, whose Differentiæ are
_contradictory_. This kind of Division is called '=Dichotomy='.
[For example, we may divide "books" into the two Classes whose
Differentiæ are "old" and "not-old."]
In performing this Process, we may sometimes find that the Attributes we
have chosen are used so loosely, in ordinary conversation, that it is
not easy to decide _which_ of the Things belong to the one Class and
_which_ to the other. In such a case, it would be necessary to lay down
some arbitrary _rule_, as to _where_ the one Class should end and the
other begin.
[Thus, in dividing "books" into "old" and "not-old," we may say
"Let all books printed before A.D. 1801, be regarded as 'old,'
and all others as 'not-old'."]
Henceforwards let it be understood that, if a Class of Things be divided
into two Classes, whose Differentiæ have contrary meanings, each
Differentia is to be regarded as equivalent to the other with the word
"not" prefixed.
[Thus, if "books" be divided into "old" and "new" the Attribute
"old" is to be regarded as equivalent to "not-new," and the
Attribute "new" as equivalent to "not-old."]
pg004
After dividing a Class, by the Process of _Dichotomy_, into two smaller
Classes, we may sub-divide each of these into two still smaller Classes;
and this Process may be repeated over and over again, the number of
Classes being doubled at each repetition.
[For example, we may divide "books" into "old" and "new" (i.e.
"_not_-old"): we may then sub-divide each of these into
"English" and "foreign" (i.e. "_not_-English"), thus getting
_four_ Classes, viz.
(1) old English;
(2) old foreign;
(3) new English;
(4) new foreign.
If we had begun by dividing into "English" and "foreign," and
had then sub-divided into "old" and "new," the four Classes
would have been
(1) English old;
(2) English new;
(3) foreign old;
(4) foreign new.
The Reader will easily see that these are the very same four
Classes which we had before.]
pg004½
CHAPTER IV.
_NAMES._
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account