[Let us take, as an example, the Proposition "John is not well".
This of course implies that there is an _Individual_, to whom
the speaker refers when he mentions "John", and whom the
listener _knows_ to be referred to. Hence the Class "men
referred to by the speaker when he mentions 'John'" is a
one-Member Class, and the Proposition is equivalent to "_All_
the men, who are referred to by the speaker when he mentions
'John', are not well."]
Propositions are of two kinds, 'Propositions of Existence' and
'Propositions of Relation.'
These shall be discussed separately.
pg011
CHAPTER II.
_PROPOSITIONS OF EXISTENCE._
A '=Proposition of Existence=', when in normal form, has, for its
_Subject_, the Class "existing Things".
Its Sign of Quantity is "Some" or "No".
[Note that, though its Sign of Quantity tells us _how many_
existing Things are Members of its Predicate, it does _not_ tell
us the _exact_ number: in fact, it only deals with _two_
numbers, which are, in ascending order, "0" and "1 or more."]
It is called "a Proposition of Existence" because its effect is to
assert the _Reality_ (i.e. the real _existence_), or else the
_Imaginariness_, of its Predicate.
[Thus, the Proposition "Some existing Things are honest men"
asserts that the Class "honest men" is _Real_.
This is the _normal_ form; but it may also be expressed in any
one of the following forms:--
(1) "Honest men exist";
(2) "Some honest men exist";
(3) "The Class 'honest men' exists";
(4) "There are honest men";
(5) "There are some honest men".
Similarly, the Proposition "No existing Things are men fifty
feet high" asserts that the Class "men 50 feet high" is
_Imaginary_.
This is the _normal_ form; but it may also be expressed in any
one of the following forms:--
(1) "Men 50 feet high do not exist";
(2) "No men 50 feet high exist";
(3) "The Class 'men 50 feet high' does not exist";
(4) "There are not any men 50 feet high";
(5) "There are no men 50 feet high."]
pg012
CHAPTER III.
_PROPOSITIONS OF RELATION._
§ 1.
_Introductory._
A =Proposition of Relation=, of the kind to be here discussed, has, for
its Terms, two Specieses of the same Genus, such that each of the two
Names conveys the idea of some Attribute _not_ conveyed by the other.
[Thus, the Proposition "Some merchants are misers" is of the
right kind, since "merchants" and "misers" are Specieses of the
same Genus "men"; and since the Name "merchants" conveys the
idea of the Attribute "mercantile", and the name "misers" the
idea of the Attribute "miserly", each of which ideas is _not_
conveyed by the other Name.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account