Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
The Epistle to the Hebrews, the style of which is so unlike that
of the Apostle Paul, was possibly written by Apollos, who was an
Alexandrian Jew, “a learned man” and “mighty in the Scriptures”_
(Acts 18:24)_; but it may notwithstanding have been written at the
suggestion and under the direction of Paul, and so be essentially
Pauline. A. C. Kendrick, in American Commentary on Hebrews, points
out that while the style of Paul is prevailingly dialectic, and
only in rapt moments becomes rhetorical or poetic, the style of
the Epistle to the Hebrews is prevailingly rhetorical, is free
from anacolutha, and is always dominated by emotion. He holds that
these characteristics point to Apollos as its author. Contrast
also Paul’s method of quoting the O. T.: “it is written”_ (Rom.
11:8; 1 Cor. 1:31; Gal. 3:10)_ with that of the Hebrews: “he
saith”_ (8:5, 13)_, “he hath said”_ (4:4)_. Paul quotes the O. T.
fifty or sixty times, but never in this latter way. _Heb.
2:3—_“which having at the first been spoken by the Lord, was
confirmed unto us by them that heard”—shows that the writer did
not receive the gospel at first hand. Luther and Calvin rightly
saw in this a decisive proof that Paul was not the author, for he
always insisted on the primary and independent character of his
gospel. Harnack formerly thought the epistle written by Barnabas
to Christians at Rome, A. D. 81-96. More recently however he
attributes it to Priscilla, the wife of Aquila, or to their joint
authorship. The majesty of its diction, however, seems unfavorable
to this view. William T. C. Hanna: “The words of the author ...
are marshalled grandly, and move with the tread of an army, or
with the swell of a tidal wave”; see Franklin Johnson, Quotations
in N. T. from O. T., xii. Plumptre, Introd. to N. T., 37, and in
Expositor, Vol. I, regards the author of this epistle as the same
with that of the Apocryphal Wisdom of Solomon, the latter being
composed before, the former after, the writer’s conversion to
Christianity. Perhaps our safest conclusion is that of Origen:
“God only knows who wrote it.” Harnack however remarks: “The time
in which our ancient Christian literature, the N. T. included, was
considered as a web of delusions and falsifications, is past. The
oldest literature of the church is, in its main points, and in
most of its details, true and trustworthy.” See articles on
Hebrews, in Smith’s and in Hastings’ Bible Dictionaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account