Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 1 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Jonathan Edwards, one of the greatest of metaphysicians and
theologians, was an idealist who held that God is the only real
cause, either in the realm of matter or in the realm of mind. He
regarded the chief good as happiness—a form of sensibility. Virtue
was voluntary choice of this good. Hence union with Adam in acts
and exercises was sufficient. Thus God’s will made identity of
being with Adam. This led to the exercise-system of Hopkins and
Emmons, on the one hand, and to Bellamy’s and Dwight’s denial of
any imputation of Adam’s sin or of inborn depravity, on the
other—in which last denial agree many other New England
theologians who reject the exercise-scheme, as for example,
Strong, Tyler, Smalley, Burton, Woods, and Park. Dr. N. W. Taylor
added a more distinctly Arminian element, the power of contrary
choice—and with this tenet of the New Haven theology, Charles G.
Finney, of Oberlin, substantially agreed. Horace Bushnell held to
a practically Sabellian view of the Trinity, and to a
moral-influence theory of the atonement. Thus from certain
principles admitted by Edwards, who held in the main to an Old
School theology, the New School theology has been gradually
developed.
Robert Hall called Edwards “the greatest of the sons of men.” Dr.
Chalmers regarded him as the “greatest of theologians.” Dr.
Fairbairn says: “He is not only the greatest of all the thinkers
that America has produced, but also the highest speculative genius
of the eighteenth century. In a far higher degree than Spinoza, he
was a ’God-intoxicated man.’” His fundamental notion that there is
no causality except the divine was made the basis of a theory of
necessity which played into the hands of the deists whom he
opposed and was alien not only to Christianity but even to theism.
Edwards could not have gotten his idealism from Berkeley; it may
have been suggested to him by the writings of Locke or Newton,
Cudworth or Descartes, John Norris or Arthur Collier. See Prof. H.
N. Gardiner, in Philos. Rev., Nov. 1900:573-596; Prof. E. C.
Smyth, in Am. Jour. Theol., Oct. 1897:956; Allen, Jonathan
Edwards, 16, 308-310, and in Atlantic Monthly, Dec. 1891:767;
Sanborn, in Jour. Spec. Philos., Oct. 1883:401-420; G. P. Fisher,
Edwards on the Trinity, 18, 19.
(_b_) The older Calvinism, represented by Charles Hodge the father
(1797-1878) and A. A. Hodge the son (1823-1886), together with Henry B.
Smith (1815-1877), Robert J. Breckinridge (1800-1871), Samuel J. Baird,
and William G. T. Shedd (1820-1894). All these, although with minor
differences, hold to views of human depravity and divine grace more nearly
conformed to the doctrine of Augustine and Calvin, and are for this reason
distinguished from the New England theologians and their followers by the
popular title of Old School.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account