Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
We grant, in reply, that the argument for absolute creation derived from
the mere word ברא is not entirely conclusive. Other considerations in
connection with the use of this word, however, seem to render this
interpretation of Gen. 1:1 the most plausible. Some of these
considerations we proceed to mention.
(_a_) While we acknowledge that the verb ברא “does not necessarily or
invariably denote production without the use of preëxisting materials, we
still maintain that it signifies the production of an effect for which no
natural antecedent existed before, and which can be only the result of
divine agency.” For this reason, in the Kal species it is used only of
God, and is never accompanied by any accusative denoting material.
No accusative denoting material follows _bara_, in the passages
indicated, for the reason that all thought of material was absent.
See Dillmann, Genesis, 18; Oehler, Theol. O. T., 1:177. The
quotation in the text above is from Green, Hebrew Chrestomathy,
67. But E. G. Robinson, Christian Theology, 88, remarks: “Whether
the Scriptures teach the absolute origination of matter—its
creation out of nothing—is an open question.... No decisive
evidence is furnished by the Hebrew word _bara_.”
A moderate and scholarly statement of the facts is furnished by
Professor W. J. Beecher, in S. S. Times, Dec. 23, 1893:807—“To
create is to originate divinely.... Creation, in the sense in
which the Bible uses the word, does not exclude the use of
materials previously existing; for man was taken from the ground
(_Gen. 2:7_), and woman was builded from the rib of a man
(_2:22_). Ordinarily God brings things into existence through the
operation of second causes. But it is possible, in our thinking,
to withdraw attention from the second causes, and to think of
anything as originating simply from God, apart from second causes.
To think of a thing thus is to think of it as created. The Bible
speaks of Israel as created, of the promised prosperity of
Jerusalem as created, of the Ammonite people and the king of Tyre
as created, of persons of any date in history as created (_Is.
43:1-15_; _65:18_; _Ez. 21:30_; _28:13, 15_; _Ps. 102:18_; _Eccl.
12:1_; _Mal. 2:10_). Miracles and the ultimate beginnings of
second causes are necessarily thought of as creative acts; all
other originating of things may be thought of, according to the
purpose we have in mind, either as creation or as effected by
second causes.”
(_b_) In the account of the creation, ברא seems to be distinguished from
עשה, “to make” either with or without the use of already existing material
(ברא לעשות, “created in making” or “made by creation,” in 2:3; and ויעש,
of the firmament, in 1:7), and from יצר, “to form” out of such material.
(See ויברא, of man regarded as a spiritual being, in 1:27; but ויצר, of
man regarded as a physical being, in 2:7.)
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account