Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Diman, Theistic Argument, 576, alludes to Goldwin Smith’s denial
that any scientific method can be applied to history because it
would make man a necessary link in a chain of cause and effect and
so would deny his free will. But Diman says this is no more
impossible than the development of the individual according to a
fixed law of growth, while yet free will is sedulously respected.
Froude says history is not a science, because no science could
foretell Mohammedanism or Buddhism; and Goldwin Smith says that
“prediction is the crown of all science.” But, as Diman remarks:
“geometry, geology, physiology, are sciences, yet they do not
predict.” Buckle brought history into contempt by asserting that
it could be analyzed and referred solely to intellectual laws and
forces. To all this we reply that there may be scientific tests
which are not physical, or even intellectual, but only moral. Such
a test God urges his people to use, in _Mal. 3:10_—“_Bring ye the
whole tithe into the storehouse ... and prove me now herewith, if
I will not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out a
blessing, that there shall not be room enough to receive it._” All
such prayer is a reflection of Christ’s words—some fragment of his
teaching transformed into a supplication (_John 15:7_; see
Westcott, Bib. Com., _in loco_); all such prayer is moreover the
work of the Spirit of God (_Rom. 8:26, 27_). It is therefore sure
of an answer.
But the test of prayer proposed by Tyndall is not applicable to
the thing to be tested by it. Hopkins, Prayer and the
Prayer-gauge, 22 _sq._—“We cannot measure wheat by the yard, or
the weight of a discourse with a pair of scales.... God’s wisdom
might see that it was not best for the petitioners, nor for the
objects of their petition, to grant their request. Christians
therefore could not, without special divine authorization, rest
their faith upon the results of such a test.... Why may we not ask
for great changes in nature? For the same reason that a
well-informed child does not ask for the moon as a plaything....
There are two limitations upon prayer. First, except by special
direction of God, we cannot ask for a miracle, for the same reason
that a child could not ask his father to burn the house down.
Nature is the house we live in. Secondly, we cannot ask for
anything under the laws of nature which would contravene the
object of those laws. Whatever we can do for ourselves under these
laws, God expects us to do. If the child is cold, let him go near
the fire,—not beg his father to carry him.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account