Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
Herbert Spencer’s Sociology is only social physics. He denies
freedom, and declares anyone who will affix D. V. to the
announcement of the Mildmay Conference to be incapable of
understanding sociology. Prevision excludes divine or human will.
But Mr. Spencer intimates that the evils of natural selection may
be modified by artificial selection. What is this but the
interference of will? And if man can interfere, cannot God do the
same? Yet the wise child will not expect the father to give
everything he asks for. Nor will the father who loves his child
give him the razor to play with, or stuff him with unwholesome
sweets, simply because the child asks these things. If the
engineer of the ocean steamer should give me permission to press
the lever that sets all the machinery in motion, I should decline
to use my power and should prefer to leave such matters to him,
unless he first suggested it and showed me how. So the Holy Spirit
“_helpeth our infirmity; for we know not how to pray as we ought;
but the Spirit himself __ maketh intercession for us with
groanings which cannot be uttered_” (_Rom. 8:26_). And we ought
not to talk of “submitting” to perfect Wisdom, or of “being
resigned” to perfect Love. Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra,
2:1—“What they [the gods] do delay, they do not deny.... We,
ignorant of ourselves, Beg often our own harms, which the wise
powers Deny us for our good; so find we profit By losing of our
prayers.” See Thornton, Old-Fashioned Ethics, 286-297. _Per
contra_, see Galton, Inquiries into Human Faculty, 277-294.
3. To Christian activity.
Here the truth lies between the two extremes of quietism and naturalism.
(_a_) In opposition to the false abnegation of human reason and will which
quietism demands, we hold that God guides us, not by continual miracle,
but by his natural providence and the energizing of our faculties by his
Spirit, so that we rationally and freely do our own work, and work out our
own salvation.
Upham, Interior Life, 356, defines quietism as “cessation of
wandering thoughts and discursive imaginations, rest from
irregular desires and affections, and perfect submission of the
will.” Its advocates, however, have often spoken of it as a giving
up of our will and reason, and a swallowing up of these in the
wisdom and will of God. This phraseology is misleading, and savors
of a pantheistic merging of man in God. Dorner: “Quietism makes
God a monarch without living subjects.” Certain English quietists,
like the Mohammedans, will not employ physicians in sickness. They
quote _2 Chron. 16:12, 13_—Asa “_sought not to Jehovah, but to the
physicians. And Asa slept with his fathers_.” They forget that the
“_physicians_” alluded to in Chronicles were probably heathen
necromancers. Cromwell to his Ironsides: “Trust God, and keep your
powder dry!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account