Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
We are inclined still to hold that the doctrine of absolute
creation was known to no other ancient nation besides the Hebrews.
Recent investigations, however, render this somewhat more doubtful
than it once seemed to be. Sayce, Hibbert Lectures, 142, 143,
finds creation among the early Babylonians. In his Religions of
Ancient Egypt and Babylonia, 372-397, he says: “The elements of
Hebrew cosmology are all Babylonian; even the creative word itself
was a Babylonian conception; but the spirit which inspires the
cosmology is the antithesis to that which inspired the cosmology
of Babylonia. Between the polytheism of Babylonia and the
monotheism of Israel a gulf is fixed which cannot be spanned. So
soon as we have a clear monotheism, absolute creation is a
corollary. As the monotheistic idea is corrupted, creation gives
place to pantheistic transformation.”
It is now claimed by others that Zoroastrianism, the Vedas, and
the religion of the ancient Egyptians had the idea of absolute
creation. On creation in the Zoroastrian system, see our treatment
of Dualism, page 382. Vedic hymn in Rig Veda, 10:9, quoted by J.
F. Clarke, Ten Great Religions, 2:205—“Originally this universe
was soul only; nothing else whatsoever existed, active or
inactive. He thought: ‘I will create worlds’; thus he created
these various worlds: earth, light, mortal being, and the waters.”
Renouf, Hibbert Lectures, 216-222, speaks of a papyrus on the
staircase of the British Museum, which reads: “The great God, the
Lord of heaven and earth, who made all things which are ... the
almighty God, self-existent, who made heaven and earth; ... the
heaven was yet uncreated, uncreated was the earth; thou hast put
together the earth; ... who made all things, but was not made.”
But the Egyptian religion in its later development, as well as
Brahmanism, was pantheistic, and it is possible that all the
expressions we have quoted are to be interpreted, not as
indicating a belief in creation out of nothing, but as asserting
emanation, or the taking on by deity of new forms and modes of
existence. On creation in heathen systems, see Pierret,
Mythologie, and answer to it by Maspero; Hymn to Amen-Rha, in
“Records of the Past”; G. C. Müller, Literature of Greece, 87, 88;
George Smith, Chaldean Genesis, chapters 1, 3, 5 and 6; Dillmann,
Com. on Genesis, 6th edition, Introd., 5-10; LeNormant, Hist.
Ancienne de l’Orient, 1:17-26; 5:238; Otto Zöckler, art.:
Schöpfung, in Herzog and Plitt, Encyclop.; S. B. Gould, Origin and
Devel. of Relig. Beliefs, 281-292.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account