Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Religion
Systematic Theology (Volume 2 of 3)
Strong, Augustus Hopkins
Baptists -- Doctrines; Theology, Doctrinal
_Rom. 5:12_—“_Therefore, as through one man sin entered into the
world, and death through sin; and so death passed unto all men,
for that all sinned_”; _19_—“_For as through the one man’s
disobedience the many were made sinners, even so through the
obedience of the one shall the many be made righteous_”; _1 Cor.
15:21, 22_—“_For since by man came death, by man came also the
resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in
Christ shall all be made alive_”; _Heb. 2:16_—“_For verily not of
angels doth he take hold, but he taketh hold of the seed of
Abraham._” One of the most eminent ethnologists and
anthropologists, Prof. D. G. Brinton, said not long before his
death that all scientific research and teaching tended to the
conviction that mankind has descended from one pair.
(_c_) This descent of humanity from a single pair also constitutes the
ground of man’s obligation of natural brotherhood to every member of the
race.
_Acts 17:26_—“_he made of one every nation of men to dwell on all
the face of the earth_”—here the Rev. Vers. omits the word
“_blood_” (“_made of one blood_”—Auth. Vers.). The word to be
supplied is possibly “father,” but more probably “body”; _cf._
_Heb. 2:11_—“_for both he that sanctifieth and they that are
sanctified are all of one_ [father or body]: _for which cause he
is not ashamed to call them brethren, saying, I will declare thy
name unto my brethren, In the midst of the congregation will I
sing thy praise._”
Winchell, in his Preadamites, has recently revived the theory
broached in 1655 by Peyrerius, that there were men before Adam:
“Adam is descended from a black race—not the black races from
Adam.” Adam is simply “the remotest ancestor to whom the Jews
could trace their lineage.... The derivation of Adam from an older
human stock is essentially the creation of Adam.” Winchell does
not deny the unity of the race, nor the retroactive effect of the
atonement upon those who lived before Adam; he simply denies that
Adam was the first man. 297—He “regards the Adamic stock as
derived from an older and humbler human type,” originally as low
in the scale as the present Australian savages.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account